2020
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter longitudinal cross-sectional study comparing effectiveness of serratus anterior plane, paravertebral and thoracic epidural for the analgesia of multiple rib fractures

Abstract: BackgroundThere is a paucity of data comparing effectiveness of various techniques for pain management of traumatic rib fractures. This study compared the quality of analgesia provided by serratus anterior plane (SAP) catheters against thoracic epidural (TEA) or paravertebral catheters (PA) in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures (MRFs).Methods354 patients who received either SAP, TEA or PA at two tertiary referral major trauma centers in the UK were included (2016–2018). Primary outcome were change … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were five studies comparing serratus anterior plane block with thoracic paravertebral blockade, four of which were in breast surgery. As with the PECS2 block in other metaanalyses [32,33,37], the serratus anterior plane block was equivalent to thoracic paravertebral blockade regarding almost all analgesic outcomes, except for higher pain scores in the immediate postoperative period (< 2 h) in the serratus anterior plane block group (mean difference 1.0, 95%CI 0.6-1.4, p < 0.001) [42].…”
Section: Anterolateral Chest Wall and Axillary Regionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were five studies comparing serratus anterior plane block with thoracic paravertebral blockade, four of which were in breast surgery. As with the PECS2 block in other metaanalyses [32,33,37], the serratus anterior plane block was equivalent to thoracic paravertebral blockade regarding almost all analgesic outcomes, except for higher pain scores in the immediate postoperative period (< 2 h) in the serratus anterior plane block group (mean difference 1.0, 95%CI 0.6-1.4, p < 0.001) [42].…”
Section: Anterolateral Chest Wall and Axillary Regionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…There is evidence that a serratus anterior plane block alone, without the PECS1 component, can provide clinically useful chest wall analgesia. A recent meta-analysis reviewed 19 RCTs comparing serratus anterior plane block with either systemic analgesia alone or thoracic paravertebral blockade, in both breast (13 studies) and thoracic surgery (six studies) [42]. The addition of a serratus anterior plane block significantly reduced pain scores during the first 24 postoperative hours, with a mean difference ranging from 1.3-1.7 at 0-6 h (p < 0.001) to a more modest 0.7-0.9 (p < 0.001) at 12-24 h. Similar magnitudes of effect were seen on sub-group analyses of breast vs. thoracic surgery, superficial vs. deep serratus anterior plane block and studies at low risk of bias.…”
Section: Anterolateral Chest Wall and Axillary Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 SAPB was suggested to be easy and safe procedure because of the superficial position of the target point that doesn't involve any major vessels. 6 It has been reported to provide efficient analgesia in many different trials such as; in patients with multiple rib fracture compared to TEA and PVB [11] , in breast cancer surgeries [12] and minimal invasive heart surgeries .13 Previous trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of SAPB compared to the TEA in thoracic surgeries. 14, 15,16,17 This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SSPB, DSPB and TEA in thoracotomies in patients with lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were several case reports and series which were identified on literature search. Papers in which SAPB was performed in critically ill patients with multiple injuries were not analyzed as they did not fulfill the inclusion criteria [18,19].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%