2005
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.03.1997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Phase I/II Study of Cetuximab With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Untreated Patients With Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: The combination of cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin was safe and well tolerated in this population of stage IV patients. The response rate, time to progression, and median survival were slightly superior to historical controls treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone. A randomized phase II trial has completed accrual.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
73
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The median PFS interval in our study was 2.8 months, similar to previously reported data [37]. However, some studies of less heavily pretreated or treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC reported better outcomes, with median PFS times of 4 -5 months [32,38]. In advanced/metastatic NSCLC, the median OS time on first-line therapy rarely exceeds 11 months and the median PFS duration is usually around 5 months [39 -42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The median PFS interval in our study was 2.8 months, similar to previously reported data [37]. However, some studies of less heavily pretreated or treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC reported better outcomes, with median PFS times of 4 -5 months [32,38]. In advanced/metastatic NSCLC, the median OS time on first-line therapy rarely exceeds 11 months and the median PFS duration is usually around 5 months [39 -42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A series of phase II trials suggested the benefit of cetuximab in combination with platinum doubles in the first-line treatment setting. [113][114][115][116][117] [77][78][79][80] M225 has slightly more effective anti-EGFR activity than M528, which is in turn more effective than M579. The phase I trial with M225 was successful, but all patients produced human-anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA).…”
Section: Cetuximab In the Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the majority of human epithelial cancers are marked by functional activation of growth factors and receptors of the EGFR. Targeting the EGFR is currently available for the treatment of different types of epithelial cancers, such as non-small-cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer (3)(4)(5)(6). The treatment demonstrated that EGFR inhibitors bind to the extracellular domain of the EGFR when it is in the inactive configuration, compete for receptor binding by occluding the ligand-binding region, and thereby directly block ligand-induced EGFR tyrosine kinase activation on cancer cells (7,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%