2010
DOI: 10.1002/da.20695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator and placebo-controlled trial of a corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 antagonist in generalized anxiety disorder

Abstract: Background: Antagonism of corticotropin‐releasing factor (CRF) receptors has been hypothesized as a potential target for the development of novel anxiolytics. This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of pexacerfont, a selective CRF‐1 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Method: This was a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled and active comparator trial. Two hundred and sixty patients were randomly assigned to pexacerfont 100 mg/da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, reports are accumulating in which studies have failed to detect activity of CRF1 antagonists in disease populations where animal work has predicted it, such as depression (Binneman et al, 2008;GlaxoSmithKline, 2010), anxiety disorders (Coric et al, 2010), or AD (Kwako et al, 2015;present study). If target engagement has, in fact, been achieved in these studies, appropriate patient populations have been targeted, and informative outcomes have been assessed, then the possibility must be considered that a consistent activity pattern of CRF1 antagonists in preclinical behavioral assays does not translate between rodents and humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, reports are accumulating in which studies have failed to detect activity of CRF1 antagonists in disease populations where animal work has predicted it, such as depression (Binneman et al, 2008;GlaxoSmithKline, 2010), anxiety disorders (Coric et al, 2010), or AD (Kwako et al, 2015;present study). If target engagement has, in fact, been achieved in these studies, appropriate patient populations have been targeted, and informative outcomes have been assessed, then the possibility must be considered that a consistent activity pattern of CRF1 antagonists in preclinical behavioral assays does not translate between rodents and humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first CRF1 antagonist to be evaluated in humans, R121919, showed promise in depression (Zobel et al, 2000), but was terminated owing to safety issues widely shared by first-generation CRF1 antagonists. CRF1 antagonists with improved safety followed, but yielded negative results both in depression (Binneman et al, 2008) and anxiety disorders (Coric et al, 2010). Recently, we evaluated the effects of pexacerfont, a potent, selective, orally available and brain penetrant CRF1 antagonist, on a battery of experimental outcomes in AD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…153 A reversible increase in liver enzymes in a separate Phase I study 154 led to discontinuation of its clinical development. There has been a series of other compounds that have generated promising animal data, but a number of these have led to abandoned 155 or negative Phase II trials, 156 eg, CP-316,311 in a recurrent depression trial, 157 pexacerfont (BMS-562,086) in a generalized anxiety disorder trial, 158 and GSK561679 in a depression study. 159 The results of a depression trial 160 using SSR125543, the SanofiAventis compound, are not yet available.…”
Section: Corticotrophin-releasing Hormone Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the largest study to date (n=260), Coric et al conducted an 8-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with Pexacerfont (BMS-562,086) for generalized anxiety disorder. No significant anxiolytic effect was observed compared to placebo though the comparator in the study, escitalopram, was efficacious [38][39]. It is important to note that these studies have not used narrowly defined patient sub-types such as psychotic, anxious or atypical depression, but instead have utilized the broader MDD inclusion criterion.…”
Section: Crf1 Receptor Antagonists In Mood and Anxiety Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%