2017
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Retrospective Study of Neurostimulation With Exit of Therapy by Explant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a survey of 30 patients with movement disorders visiting a pre-DBS clinic (mean age 65, range 45-79 years), 63% chose the recharge-free device compared to 37% for the rechargeable device, even though the battery longevity of the recharge-free device was estimated at only 3-5 years [22]. In a multicenter, retrospective study with 352 explanted SCS patients it was reported that patients with rechargeable devices terminated their therapy earlier than patients with recharge-free devices [23]. This observation may be consistent with an increased burden for therapy maintenance, which could be related to a higher probability of device removal [23].…”
Section: Treatment Compliance and Disease Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey of 30 patients with movement disorders visiting a pre-DBS clinic (mean age 65, range 45-79 years), 63% chose the recharge-free device compared to 37% for the rechargeable device, even though the battery longevity of the recharge-free device was estimated at only 3-5 years [22]. In a multicenter, retrospective study with 352 explanted SCS patients it was reported that patients with rechargeable devices terminated their therapy earlier than patients with recharge-free devices [23]. This observation may be consistent with an increased burden for therapy maintenance, which could be related to a higher probability of device removal [23].…”
Section: Treatment Compliance and Disease Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews of explant data also examined the potential reasons for device explantation. Pope and colleagues in their retrospective review of 352 SCS cases found that 43.9% (152/346) of explants occurred due to failure or lack of efficacy , and Van Buyten et al in a study of more than 900 patients, found that 50% of the devices were explanted due to therapeutic failure . These failures of device may suggest the need for different approaches, specifically with traditionally difficult pain patterns and regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…explants occurred due to failure or lack of efficacy (14), and Van Buyten et al in a study of more than 900 patients, found that 50% of the devices were explanted due to therapeutic failure (2). These failures of device may suggest the need for different approaches, specifically with traditionally difficult pain patterns and regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, challenges remain to better measure efficacy in a more objective manner. Currently, we still have some patients even after adequate trialing that struggle with long-term efficacy as demonstrated through the reported rate of device failures leading to explant as 20-30% of permanent implants (4). Often, patients explanted have a tenure of therapy less than 18 months (4).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%