2015
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Semiquantitative Evaluation of 123I‐FP‐CIT Brain SPECT

Abstract: A unique, accurate threshold for all centers, with high sensitivity and specificity was identified. Semiquantitative assessment of (123)I-FP-CIT brain SPECT among different centers resulted reliable, accurate, and potentially useful in clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Univariate statistics of semiquantitative evaluation confirm previous findings [33] of significantly decreased uptake in all forms of PS compared to subjects with non-degenerative conditions, namely lower striatal uptake, as well as higher AI and C/P ratio.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Univariate statistics of semiquantitative evaluation confirm previous findings [33] of significantly decreased uptake in all forms of PS compared to subjects with non-degenerative conditions, namely lower striatal uptake, as well as higher AI and C/P ratio.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The high sensitivity (97.0%) and specificity values (93.3%) observed for the automated evaluation of the putaminal region were also comparable to those observed for the validated visual grading or the manual evaluation of the putaminal region, but please note that these values are highly dependent on the actual cutoff points used. Uptake ratios derived from the caudal region showed lower diagnostic performance for both the automated and the manual evaluation techniques, which is consistent with earlier studies [6,24]. The lower diagnostic accuracy for caudate could be due to partial volume effect and anatomical variability between subjects [10], or due to the pattern of Parkinson disease degeneration (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Several automatic quantification methods for DAT imaging evaluation have been released in recent years, such as BasGan (Basal Ganglia, freely available from the Italian association of Nuclear Medicine 1 ), DaTView (Nihon Medi-Physics, Tokyo, Japan), DaTQUANT (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), and BRASS (Hermes BRASS software, Nuclear Diagnostics AB, Sweden) (Garibotto et al, 2013; Skanjeti et al, 2015; Yokoyama et al, 2017). Most of them can give the DAT binding values in the basal ganglia automatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%