2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Study of the Psychometric Properties of the New Demoralization Scale (DS-II) in Spanish-Speaking Advanced Cancer Patients

Abstract: Context. Demoralization is a state of existential distress in patients with advanced illness, typically with coping difficulties, feelings of loss of sense, and purpose in life and despair, among other things. The New Demoralization Scale (DS-II) is an evaluation tool for this syndrome, which has recently been reformulated on a shorter scale.Objectives. The objective of this study was to obtain a Spanish version of the DS-II and to assess its psychometric properties in advanced cancer patients in Spain and a n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the items contributed substantially to the total score and to the subscales, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total scale and for the subscales were almost excellent. The coefficients were slightly higher than in the study testing the DS-II in a sample of patients receiving palliative care (Robinson et al, 2016b), and they were also higher than the coefficients obtained in a sample of Spanish patients with advanced cancer (Belar et al, 2019). The higher reliability coefficients may be explained (at least partly) by the fact that our study did not only include patients with advanced stages of cancer, some of whom suffer from cognitive impairment, so coherent item responses may have been somewhat more likely in our sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of the items contributed substantially to the total score and to the subscales, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total scale and for the subscales were almost excellent. The coefficients were slightly higher than in the study testing the DS-II in a sample of patients receiving palliative care (Robinson et al, 2016b), and they were also higher than the coefficients obtained in a sample of Spanish patients with advanced cancer (Belar et al, 2019). The higher reliability coefficients may be explained (at least partly) by the fact that our study did not only include patients with advanced stages of cancer, some of whom suffer from cognitive impairment, so coherent item responses may have been somewhat more likely in our sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The DS-II demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.89 for the total scale; α = 0.84 for the Meaning and Purpose subscale, and α = 0.82 for the Distress and Coping Ability subscale) ( Robinson et al, 2016b ). Subsequently, a Spanish version of the DS-II was tested in a sample of 150 patients with advanced cancer stages in Spain and a number of Latin American countries ( Belar et al, 2019 ). The Spanish DS-II version also showed a high internal consistency with α = 0.88 (total DS-II scale), α = 0.83 ( Meaning and Purpose) , and α = 0.79 ( Distress and Coping Ability ) ( Belar et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, concern has been raised about the ability of the HADS depression subscale to identify depression in ill populations as the HADS items may capture an increase in anhedonia with physical disease burden and not true depressive symptoms. 40 Psychometric analyses show strong, positive correlations of the Spanish-and English-language HADS total and subscale scores with other measures commonly used to assess for depression and anxiety in patients with chronic illness, 11,41 affirming the utility of the HADS as a screening tool to assess for distress that may be followed up with more detailed assessment. In addition, the present study only included women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data related to symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised, ESAS-r), 14 depressive and anxious symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), 15 perceived loss of dignity (Patient Dignity Inventory, PDI) 16 and demoralisation (Spanish version of the Demoralisation Scale, DS-II (es), with two subscales: (1) meaning and purpose in life and (2) distress and coping strategies) were collected. 17 The latter refers to the patient's ability to cope with the illness trajectory. These variables have been considered triggering factors for WTD in previous studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%