2007
DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2007.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Study of the Validity and Reliability of Subjective Global Assessment in the Hemodialysis Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
100
2
21

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
100
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In our study, SGA applied to HD patients showed a predictive power for the occurrence of hospitalizations. 6 The major limitations of SGA comprise low sensitivity to assess small changes and interindividual variation when SGA is performed by a team. It is worth mentioning that the SGA model applied in the present study has been recently validated for that population, and, as it includes the possibility of classifying the nutritional status into levels, it attenuates the low sensitivity for small changes in the nutritional status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…20 In our study, SGA applied to HD patients showed a predictive power for the occurrence of hospitalizations. 6 The major limitations of SGA comprise low sensitivity to assess small changes and interindividual variation when SGA is performed by a team. It is worth mentioning that the SGA model applied in the present study has been recently validated for that population, and, as it includes the possibility of classifying the nutritional status into levels, it attenuates the low sensitivity for small changes in the nutritional status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Regarding SGA, a model adapted and validated to HD patients was used. 6 In that model, the nutritional status was graded with a score ranging from 1 to 7, and values closer to 7 indicated well-nourished patients. According to that score, patients were classified as follows: score 7 and 6, well-nourished; 5 to 3, mild to moderately malnourished; 2 and 1 severely malnourished.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations