2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiclass classification of autofluorescence images of oral cavity lesions based on quantitative analysis

Abstract: Background Oral cancer is one of the most common diseases globally. Conventional oral examination and histopathological examination are the two main clinical methods for diagnosing oral cancer early. VELscope is an oral cancer-screening device that exploited autofluorescence. It yields inconsistent results when used to differentiate between normal, premalignant and malignant lesions. We develop a new method to increase the accuracy of differentiation. Materials and methods Five samples (images) of each of 21 n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One limitation of this study was the use of the same data for both training and validation. Jeng et al performed autofluorescence imaging using the VELscope instrument (LED Dental, Vancouver-Canada) in healthy volunteers ( n = 22) and patients presenting either premalignant ( n = 31) or malignant ( n = 16) oral lesions [ 39 ]. The data were divided into training and testing sets, the average and standard deviation of the autofluorescence intensity within ROIs were computed as features, and LDA and QDA models were trained for the discrimination among cancerous, precancerous, and healthy oral tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of this study was the use of the same data for both training and validation. Jeng et al performed autofluorescence imaging using the VELscope instrument (LED Dental, Vancouver-Canada) in healthy volunteers ( n = 22) and patients presenting either premalignant ( n = 31) or malignant ( n = 16) oral lesions [ 39 ]. The data were divided into training and testing sets, the average and standard deviation of the autofluorescence intensity within ROIs were computed as features, and LDA and QDA models were trained for the discrimination among cancerous, precancerous, and healthy oral tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Jeng et al [ 32 ] developed a principle component analysis based method that combined a VELscope and Raman spectroscopy to improve the detection of oral cancer. Jeng et al [ 32 ] further used linear discriminant analysis and quadratic discriminant analysis to increase differentiation between normal, premalignant, and malignant lesions based on the autofluorescence images acquired from the VELscope; the accuracy of the classifications was increased by 2% to 14% [ 33 ]. Huang et al [ 34 ] created a two-channel autofluorescence detection that used 375 and 460 nm excitation light sources and 479 and 525 nm band-pass emission filters to detect oral cancer and precancerous lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, oral cancer (OC) is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related deaths, although many people are unaware of its presence [ 2 ]. Of these OCs, more than 90% are oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) arising in the mucous membranes of the oral cavity and oropharynx [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%