2016 4th International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence (ISCBI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iscbi.2016.7743264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiclass common spatial pattern with artifacts removal methodology for EEG signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, the results showed improved results for adboost approach on the classification accuracy, but these results were calculated by using one versus rest approach which is considered as a binary class classification technique [24]. Meisheri et al [25] produced better CSP features after identification and removal of artifacts using joint approximate diagonalization (JAD) [26] in preprocessing of the MI-based EEG data. Fast Frobenius Diagonalization (FFDIAG) [27] was applied on the EEG signal for obtaining spatial filters by JAD then CSP is applied on the resulted signal for feature extraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the results showed improved results for adboost approach on the classification accuracy, but these results were calculated by using one versus rest approach which is considered as a binary class classification technique [24]. Meisheri et al [25] produced better CSP features after identification and removal of artifacts using joint approximate diagonalization (JAD) [26] in preprocessing of the MI-based EEG data. Fast Frobenius Diagonalization (FFDIAG) [27] was applied on the EEG signal for obtaining spatial filters by JAD then CSP is applied on the resulted signal for feature extraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common spatial pattern (CSP) feature extraction was initially applied in the classification of motor imagery EEG [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The CSP-based algorithms can effectively discriminate two different events by minimizing the variance of one class while maximizing the variance of another class, giving better classification accuracy [17,22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, CSP-based methods are limited to two-class classification of EEG data since CSP requires simultaneous diagonalization [23]. However, in the case of classification for more than two classes, approaches such as one-versus-rest, divide and conquer, and joint approximate diagonalization can be used for multiclass extension [1,18,23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vzard et al [24] employed common spatial pa ern (CSP) along with LDA to pre-process EEG data and obtained an accuracy of 71.59% on binary alertness states. Meisheri et al [14] exploited multi-class CSP (mCSP) combined with Self-Regulated Interval Type-2 Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (SRIT2NFIS) classi er for four EEG-based motor imagery classes (movement imagination of le hand, right hand, both feet, and tongue) classi cation and achieved the accuracy of 54.63%, which is signi cantly lower than the accuracy of binary classi cation. Shiratori et al [23] achieved a similar accuracy of 56.7% using mCSP coupled to the random forests for a three-class EEG-based motor imagery task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%