“…Currently, there are many techniques available for copper and arsenic detection, such as atomic absorption/emission spectrometry (AAS/AES) [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS) [ 13 , 14 ], X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) [ 15 , 16 ], inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) [ 17 , 18 ], electrochemistry [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], ultraviolet–visible absorption spectrometry (UV–Vis)/colorimetry [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], and fluorescence spectroscopy [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], etc. These methods have their characteristics and advantages for testing different environmental samples, but the drawbacks of some methods, such as AAS/AES and ICP–MS, which require expensive and large instruments and specialized operators, limit their applications [ 27 , 30 ].…”