2017
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2017.00053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicomponent Dark Matter in Radiative Seesaw Models

Abstract: We discuss radiative seesaw models, in which an exact Z 2 × Z ′ 2 symmetry is imposed. Due to the exact Z 2 × Z ′ 2 symmetry, neutrino masses are generated at a two-loop level and at least two extra stable electrically neutral particles are predicted. We consider two models: one has a multi-component dark matter system and the other one has a dark radiation in addition to a dark matter. In the multi-component dark matter system, non-standard dark matter annihilation processes exist. We find that they play impo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
(342 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non observation of DM in direct search experiments like LUX [25], XENON 1T [25][26][27], Panda X [28] put a stringent bound on this model (with mass below 1 TeV getting disallowed) due to its prediction of large spin independent (SI) direct search cross section. As an alternative, multi-component DM scenarios [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] are proposed where DM-DM interactions (see for example, [39,40]) play an important role to evade direct search bound.Such an attempt was made in [39], where two singlet scalars serve as two DM components, that satisfy required DM constraints. However, the framework is unable to accommodate the low mass region corresponding to both the DM's masses, simultaneously below 500 GeV, to satisfy DM direct search bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non observation of DM in direct search experiments like LUX [25], XENON 1T [25][26][27], Panda X [28] put a stringent bound on this model (with mass below 1 TeV getting disallowed) due to its prediction of large spin independent (SI) direct search cross section. As an alternative, multi-component DM scenarios [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] are proposed where DM-DM interactions (see for example, [39,40]) play an important role to evade direct search bound.Such an attempt was made in [39], where two singlet scalars serve as two DM components, that satisfy required DM constraints. However, the framework is unable to accommodate the low mass region corresponding to both the DM's masses, simultaneously below 500 GeV, to satisfy DM direct search bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the only requirement for the axion in our model being cold DM is to have a mass m DM a ≤ 10 −2 eV in order to fall in the range of any of the allowed scenarios. However, note that having multi-component DM is also a viable possibility [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] and the axion could be responsible for only a fraction of the DM density, thus relaxing the constraints. For more details on axion DM we refer the reader to [63].…”
Section: Jhep09(2020)137mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multipartite DM frameworks [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] can provide a cushion to the tension of WIMP like particles to satisfy simultaneously relic density and direct search constraints. This is essentially due to some processes which can still contribute to the depletion of DM number density for thermal freeze-out, but do not contribute to direct search cross-sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%