2015
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.03042-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicountry Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Two Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays and Two Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Diagnosing Dengue Fever

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most published dengue RDT evaluation studies used serum samples. Some studies also used whole blood specimen and only one used capillary blood [26][27][28][29]. The excellent agreement between the results tested on capillary, venous, and serum samples in this study demonstrated that all three of them can be used on RDT, provided that anticoagulant-coated tool is used for the collection of whole blood specimen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Most published dengue RDT evaluation studies used serum samples. Some studies also used whole blood specimen and only one used capillary blood [26][27][28][29]. The excellent agreement between the results tested on capillary, venous, and serum samples in this study demonstrated that all three of them can be used on RDT, provided that anticoagulant-coated tool is used for the collection of whole blood specimen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, leukopaenia and DOF were statistically significant predictors only in the model without RDT results. This could be explained by the adequate performance of the rapid tests in this setting, and the likelihood of clinicians to rely on such a test when they have access to them . Thrombocytopaenia and abdominal pain however, were significant and consistent predictors throughout the entire set of our analysis, indicating that regardless of the presence or performance of RDTs, these factors are essential predictors of dengue identification in the clinical practice .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Most studies of dengue RDTs have been retrospective and used archived specimens to determine test sensitivity and specificity (24)(25)(26)28). In those studies, the overall sensitivity varied from 48.5 to 72.4%, and the specificity varied from 88.8 to 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%