Multicriteria Decision Aid in Supporting Decisions Related to Groundwater Protection

Abstract

In the recent decades, there have been frequent conflicts between groundwater resources and environmentally hazardous activities. An example is the construction of the new highway through the important glaciofluvial esker aquifer Nybroåsen, which passes the protection zone of the water supply for the Kalmar municipality, in the southeastern part of Sweden. The decision to build the new road through this important aquifer has been strongly questioned by the municipality and the public because the value of the water resources in Nybroåsen was not taken into consideration during the first phase of the decision-making process. Multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) is applied as a tool to structure and analyze the four road alternatives proposed in the environmental impact assessment for the above conflict. The alternatives, including the existing road, are in conflict with water resources, agriculture, natural, and cultural values. The impacts on the water resources have been predicted by a two-dimensional physically based time-variant flow and solute groundwater model, which has been calibrated and evaluated. The MCDA illustrates how it can be used to identify (1) actors and their concerns, (2) ranking of alternative road scenarios according to actors' preferences, and (3) coalition groups of actors, i.e., groups that have similar views with regard to the road alternatives. The analysis shows that the two best compromise solutions obtained in the MCDA were unacceptable by the strongest coalition group, showing that either the family of criteria was not well chosen or new alternatives should have been developed.

Groundwater protection in shale gas exploration areas – a Polish perspective

“…Results of systematic monitoring in Poland in various ranges should become the base for optimal systems of operational monitoring, adjusted to issues linked with potential impact of shale gas drilling. So far, Polish experience combined with study methods arising from groundwater quality control in areas of shale gas deposits in the U.S., as well as with European guidelines on water protection resulting from obligatory Directives, are the basis for present assumptions for the optimal organization of a monitoring network in regions of shale gas production (Eliasson at. al., 2003;Scott et al, 2011).…”

A new approach for land degradation and desertification assessment using geospatial techniques

“…Based on mentioned cases, it is not an easy task to evaluate land degradation, and different methods should be investigated (Lal et al, 1997). The information produced by estimating the vulnerability to desertification and erosion (Eswaran and Reich, 1998) gives a different picture than those based on estimating the present (actual) state of land degradation (Oldeman, 1992). For example, the data based on risk assessments show that most regions of the world affected by different severity classes of water and wind erosion are 5-6 times higher than those estimates done on the basis of assessment of present status.…”

Quantitative mapping of desertification risk using the modified MEDALUS model: a case study in the Mazayejan Plain, Southwest Iran

“…In the last decades over 20 per cent of the country is exposed to desertification. It has detrimental impacts on agricultural productivity and on ecological function (Zehtabian, Jafari 2002;Eliasson et al 2003;Amiraslani, Dragovich 2009;Pan and Li 2013).…”