2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2011.00815.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriteria path and tree problems: discussion on exact algorithms and applications

Abstract: Multicriteria/multiobjective path and tree models are useful in many applications. Particularly, in Internet routing problems they seem to lead to promising approaches. In the first part of this paper, we classify and present the main exact approaches dealing with several multicriteria path problems putting in evidence the shortest path problem. In the second part, we review exact algorithms dedicated to some multicriteria tree problems, namely the minimum spanning tree and the minimum cost/minimum label spann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We developed an exact resolution approach for the formulated bicriteria spanning tree problem, based on an extension of the algorithm proposed in [46] for the minimal cost/minimal label spanning tree problem. Suggestions on possible applications of minimum label spanning tree problems to communication networks were outlined in [47] and [40]. Note that, while the minimal cost spanning tree problem (MCST) can be solved in polynomial time by using, for example, the classical algorithms by Kruskal [48] or by Prim [49], the minimum label spanning tree problem (which seeks to determine a spanning tree with the minimal number of different labels, assuming that each edge of the network is associated with a label) introduced in [50], was proven in this work to be NP-hard.…”
Section: Contributions Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We developed an exact resolution approach for the formulated bicriteria spanning tree problem, based on an extension of the algorithm proposed in [46] for the minimal cost/minimal label spanning tree problem. Suggestions on possible applications of minimum label spanning tree problems to communication networks were outlined in [47] and [40]. Note that, while the minimal cost spanning tree problem (MCST) can be solved in polynomial time by using, for example, the classical algorithms by Kruskal [48] or by Prim [49], the minimum label spanning tree problem (which seeks to determine a spanning tree with the minimal number of different labels, assuming that each edge of the network is associated with a label) introduced in [50], was proven in this work to be NP-hard.…”
Section: Contributions Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey on multicriteria minimum spanning tree problems, presenting theoretical results and algorithms, is in [39]. A review on multicriteria path and tree problems including a discussing on exact algorithms and applications is presented by Clímaco and Pascoal [40]. A proposal of a generic conceptual framework for the development of consistently multicriteria routing models in IP/QoS networks is described in [41].…”
Section: Introduction and Motivation 1introduction And Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there are two types of solutions to it: dynamic programming (DP) [8,9] and ranking [10]. Pulse algorithm [11] is a precise algorithm to solve BSP.…”
Section: Problem-solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include enumerative approaches (label-setting and label-correcting), ranking algorithms, and two-phase algorithms (e.g. see [4,2,34,35,12,37,31,5]). For the one-to-one problem, where single start and goal nodes are designated in the graph, label-setting algorithms are generally the best option for arbitrary start-goal pairs in large graphs, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiobjective (MO) shortest path problems arise in many fields, such as vehicle path planning [17,39,40], urban transportation networks [6,9], robot surveillance [7], satellite scheduling [11], routing in telecommunication networks [5], and route planning in different contexts [1,3,8,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%