2016
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20151068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidetector CT imaging features of invasive renal parenchyma urothelial carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports of the CT features of RUC did not include flowcharts depicting the selection of the patients. 9,10,35 The description and characteristics of ERUC cases in the present study differed in certain ways from those in previous studies. In the present ERUC cases, renal calculi and hydronephrosis were recorded, which were not mentioned in 3 previous reports, 9,10,35 and were reported only as unusual imaging manifestations by Prando et al 36 Zhu et al 35 reported a few RUCs with necrosis, whereas Raza et al 9 did not mention the number of necrosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports of the CT features of RUC did not include flowcharts depicting the selection of the patients. 9,10,35 The description and characteristics of ERUC cases in the present study differed in certain ways from those in previous studies. In the present ERUC cases, renal calculi and hydronephrosis were recorded, which were not mentioned in 3 previous reports, 9,10,35 and were reported only as unusual imaging manifestations by Prando et al 36 Zhu et al 35 reported a few RUCs with necrosis, whereas Raza et al 9 did not mention the number of necrosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…9,10,35 The description and characteristics of ERUC cases in the present study differed in certain ways from those in previous studies. In the present ERUC cases, renal calculi and hydronephrosis were recorded, which were not mentioned in 3 previous reports, 9,10,35 and were reported only as unusual imaging manifestations by Prando et al 36 Zhu et al 35 reported a few RUCs with necrosis, whereas Raza et al 9 did not mention the number of necrosis. Moreover, we observed higher incidence of flank pain and hematuria in the present cases of ERUC as compared to that of previous reports.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…5 a-d). These results were consistent with previous reports [ 12 , 18 , 19 ]. The cyst-solid lesions were found uncommon in both RUC and ccRCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Neither Raza nor Bata et al determined the correlation between clinical data and CT in identifying RUC and ccRCC [ 12 , 13 ]. Zhu and Ding et al only described the clinical and CT features of RUC without comparing RUC and RCC [ 18 , 19 ]. Clinical characteristics have yielded reference value for diagnosis, such as smoking history, presence of nephrolith, hematuria, and flank pain [ 20 – 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no obvious tendency about sex. Zhu et al (16) retrospectively assessed 29 patients with invasive renal parenchymal urothelial carcinoma (IRPUC) and found that IRPUC was more likely to occur in the right kidney (82.7%). However, in the present study, the ratio of malignancies in left and right kidneys was 11 vs. 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%