2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional classification of magma types for altered igneous rocks and application to their tectonomagmatic discrimination and igneous provenance of siliciclastic sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the traditional TAS diagram/method, 36 out of the 39 samples are classified as acid type, whereas the remaining three rocks E‐1, E‐2 and E‐4 were classified as basic, intermediate and basic types, respectively (Table S1). However, the new method for classification of altered rocks (by Verma, Rivera‐Gómez, et al, ), apart from classifying these three rock samples E‐1, E‐2 and E‐4 as basic, intermediate and basic types, respectively (as per the TAS method), additionally, it also classified another four rocks EAC‐RS‐3B, EAC‐RS‐5, EAC‐RS‐7 and EAC‐RS‐9, respectively, as inter, basic, basic and basic types (Table S1). Finally, to avoid any influence of the magma types on the element mobility and alteration processes, we have decided to include, 32 surface acid magmas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the traditional TAS diagram/method, 36 out of the 39 samples are classified as acid type, whereas the remaining three rocks E‐1, E‐2 and E‐4 were classified as basic, intermediate and basic types, respectively (Table S1). However, the new method for classification of altered rocks (by Verma, Rivera‐Gómez, et al, ), apart from classifying these three rock samples E‐1, E‐2 and E‐4 as basic, intermediate and basic types, respectively (as per the TAS method), additionally, it also classified another four rocks EAC‐RS‐3B, EAC‐RS‐5, EAC‐RS‐7 and EAC‐RS‐9, respectively, as inter, basic, basic and basic types (Table S1). Finally, to avoid any influence of the magma types on the element mobility and alteration processes, we have decided to include, 32 surface acid magmas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock classification is carried out using two methods: (a) the commonly used total alkali–silica (TAS) classification (Le Bas, Le Maitre, Streckeisen, & Zanettin, ) with Fe 2 O 3 /FeO ratios adjusted depending on the rock type (Middlemost, ) using the computer programme IgRoCS (Verma & Rivera‐Gómez, ); and (b) a new classification method for magma type classification for altered igneous rocks recently proposed by Verma, Rivera‐Gómez, et al () and by applying the computer programme MagClaMSys_ilr (Magma Classification Major Element based System; Verma, Rosales‐Rivera, Díaz‐González, & Quiróz‐Ruíz, ). The traditionally applied TAS diagram/method is applicable only to fresh or relatively less altered igneous rocks.…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compositional variations in whole‐rock chemistry over continuous or discrete bodies have been investigated by many studies, especially for igneous rocks (e.g. Batchelor & Bowden, ; Brandmeier & Wörner, ; Maier, Arndt, & Curl, ; Verma et al., ). Previous publications have focused mainly on empirically established characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%