Multidimensional factors determine skill acquisition development in Guided Self‐Determination: A qualitative study

Abstract

Aim The aim of the study was to investigate nurses' skill acquisition in Guided Self‐Determination according to the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition and Patricia Benner's studies based on the same model. Background Globally, person‐centred care is acknowledged as an essential aspect of quality in health care. To succeed with person‐centred care methods and skills are necessary. Guided Self‐Determination is a person‐centred method developed in the field of nursing. The method represents a new way of skill acquisition requiring knowledge of how skills are acquired, unfolded and best supported in Guided Self‐Determination. Design Qualitative interview study. Method From January 2019 to August 2019, 16 nurses were interviewed about their experiences of learning and using Guided Self‐Determination in three different gynaecological settings: cancer, endometriosis and sexual abuse. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700). Results The spectrum in Guided Self‐Determination acquisition skills ranged from following schematical procedures in a rigorous way to an extended understanding of exploring and supporting the person‐centred concept. Two main themes were identified: Elements in the transition of knowledge from theory to practice and Aspects associated with Guided Self‐Determination skill acquisition. Conclusions Nurses practised Guided Self‐Determination at different levels. Quantity of practising Guided Self‐Determination was not the only aspect determining rapid progression. The Dreyfus model lacked several explanatory components of skill acquisition, such as personal dispositions, preferences, motivation, personal values and context.

Face and content validity of the EMPOWER-UP questionnaire: a generic measure of empowerment in relational decision-making and problem-solving

“…Although the questionnaire's conceptual framework was originally developed in the context of diabetes [23], the theoretical framework has been recognized in various other contexts. The wide dissemination of an empowerment-based intervention based on the same framework [48][49][50][51] suggests that more similarities than differences exist between users with various LTHCs in terms of their sparse experiences of realized empowerment and strengthens the argument that a questionnaire built on these patterns is applicable across healthcare. In future attempts to close the gap between the aim of empowerment and its realization in practice, clinicians and researchers must be able to compare and contrast promising interventions, providing decision-makers knowledge about which interventions are most useful for whom and where.…”

Person‐specific evidence has the ability to mobilize relational capacity: A four‐step grounded theory developed in people with long‐term health conditions

“…Person-specific evidence may also decrease gaps between the person who needs healthcare and the HCP who delivers it and between HCPs with different educational backgrounds, traditions and interests (Rycroft-Malone et al, 2016). The latter was recently reported as an experience of nurses taking part in a GSD intervention in gynecologic cancer (Dehn et al, 2022).…”