Multidimensional perspective for performance assessment on climate change actions of G20 countries

Codal, Keziban Seçkin; Ari, İzzet; Codal, Ahmet

doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100639

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Implementing transportation policies like increased energy efficiency, advancements in vehicle technology, the use of electric vehicles, improvements to public transportation, increased vehicle fuel efficiency, and emission standards are all ways to implement urban planning strategies that support the reduction of emissions from the transportation sector. The most crucial objective to be met in a sustainable system is the decrease in pollutant emissions (Codal et al, 2021). In this regard, an increase in RES investments is one of the most crucial targets for long-term sustainability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability of G20 Countries within Environmental and Energy Perspectives

Gökgöz¹,

Yalçın²

2022

pesd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability is one of the most significant aims strived to achieve. Energy and the environment are interrelated factors that contribute to sustainability. Measuring energy and environmental sustainability is of utmost importance. The paper's aim is to analyze the energy and environmental performance of the G20 members. An integrated approach with MCDM methods is proposed. First, we attribute criteria weight via the CRITIC method. Secondly, we evaluate the performance of the G20 countries via the VIKOR and CoCoSo methods. Our results show that Brazil is ranked as the G20 country with the best performance. We may conclude that performance evaluation via MCDM methods may give significant insight into the sustainable development of countries.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability of G20 Countries within Environmental and Energy Perspectives

Gökgöz¹,

Yalçın²

2022

pesd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They identified countries with the best indicators according to these criteria. Codal et al [12] investigated climate change in the largest 20 member countries of the G20, using a multidimensional perspective. Their findings highlighted climate change as a significant factor in the ranking of these countries.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating European Union Countries on Climate Change Management: A Fuzzy MABAC Approach to the Climate Change Performance Index

Puška,

Hodžić,

Štilić

et al. 2024

JGELCD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was undertaken to assess the implementation effectiveness of climate change management strategies across European Union (EU) member states, employing data from the annually published Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI). The index includes assessments for 36 countries in addition to the EU member states, with evaluations presented through linguistic values. To ascertain the rankings of the EU countries, a fuzzy set approach was adopted, applying the fuzzy Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) method. Weights were derived directly from the original CCPI report. The analysis revealed that Denmark secured the highest ranking, aligning with its position in the CCPI, albeit the ranking sequence determined through the fuzzy MABAC method diverged from the original report's order. This discrepancy is attributed to the distinct characteristics and specificities of the fuzzy set approach. Sensitivity analysis within this study highlighted that certain criteria exert a more pronounced influence on the rankings, suggesting that heightened emphasis on these specific criteria could enhance the positioning of individual EU countries. Furthermore, this research elucidates the application of fuzzy methodologies in climate change impact mitigation and provides a structured guideline for their implementation. The findings advocate for a nuanced understanding of criteria significance in climate change performance assessments, offering a comprehensive framework for evaluating and improving EU countries' climate management practices.

show abstract

The United Nations SDG13 and the EU27 countries performance: A comparative analysis

Sena,

Costa,

Leitão

et al. 2024

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper evaluates the performance of the European Union 27 (EU-27), its supranational regions, and Member States (MSs) in relation to the Climate Action Sustainable Development Goal (SDG13) of the United Nations 2030 Agenda. The Alkire–Foster method is used to develop the Multidimensional Climate Action Index (MCAI) framework. Regarding individual MSs’ overall performance, the results show that Sweden (Northern Europe) performs the best and Croatia (Central and Eastern Europe) the worst. In terms of the average overall performance of individual MSs in the EU-27 and its supranational regions, only Western and Northern Europe have satisfactory scores. Moreover, the performances of the various territories differ by target. This territorial heterogeneity illustrates how the SDG13 targets may require different efforts in each territory. The scores for the MCAI group measure depict an even worse picture. Except for Northern Europe, the proportion of MSs with a satisfactory individual overall composite score (H) is lower than their average overall composite score or intensity (A). The two regions with the lowest H scores (Southern Europe and Central and Eastern Europe) also have the lowest A scores and the lowest average GDP per capita.

show abstract

Multidimensional perspective for performance assessment on climate change actions of G20 countries

Cited by 7 publications

References 17 publications

Sustainability of G20 Countries within Environmental and Energy Perspectives

Sustainability of G20 Countries within Environmental and Energy Perspectives

Evaluating European Union Countries on Climate Change Management: A Fuzzy MABAC Approach to the Climate Change Performance Index

The United Nations SDG13 and the EU27 countries performance: A comparative analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About