2005
DOI: 10.1080/14649880500287621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional Poverty Measurement with Economic Well‐being, Capability, and Social Inclusion: A Case from Kathmandu, Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being widely used, the income has been criticised because of its uni-dimensional measurement that evaluates human need based on one perspective only. Nevertheless, apart from money, people also need other non-monetary elements such as knowledge, spiritual, comfortable living and recognition among others (Wagle 2005(Wagle , 2007(Wagle , 2008. Therefore, focusing on income alone may not produce an accurate and fair assessment and thus unable to capture the holistic perspective of human needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being widely used, the income has been criticised because of its uni-dimensional measurement that evaluates human need based on one perspective only. Nevertheless, apart from money, people also need other non-monetary elements such as knowledge, spiritual, comfortable living and recognition among others (Wagle 2005(Wagle , 2007(Wagle , 2008. Therefore, focusing on income alone may not produce an accurate and fair assessment and thus unable to capture the holistic perspective of human needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La tradicional interpretación unidimensional de la pobreza ha estado dominada por la noción de solvencia económica, que se centra en los aspectos del ingreso y el consumo, equiparando la pobreza a la inhabilidad de la persona para alcanzar cierto nivel determinado de ingresos adecuado para cubrir sus necesidades básicas (Wagle, 2005).…”
Section: La Problemática De La Pobreza Desde Una Perspectiva Multidimunclassified
“…Other nonaxiomatic approaches in the literature include the fuzzy set approach (Cerioli and Zani 1990;Cheli and Lemmi 1994;Chiappero-Martinetti 2006), the distance function method (Lovell et al 1994;Anderson et al 2005), the information theory approach (Maasoumi 1993;Deutsch and Silber 2005;Maasoumi and Lugo 2008), the inertia approach and factor analysis (Klasen 2000;Sahn and Stifel 2003), and methods from the psychometric literature (Wagle 2005;Di Tommaso 2007;Krishnakumar and Ballon 2008). Batana and Duclos (2008) draw attention to the concern that the arbitrary nature of assumptions involved in choosing poverty thresholds and in aggregating across welfare dimensions and individuals may diminish the robustness of results.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%