Multidisciplinary approach to postmortem diagnostics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The technique that allows detecting various pathologies and clearly identifying the cause of death and other associated diseases without disturbing the integrity of the skin refers to postmortem radiological diagnostics and is called virtopsy. The number of autopsies decreases worldwide, which creates the need to use alternative non-invasive methods, including virtopsy. The main method of postmortem radiology is multislice computed tomography (CT), with its advantages including high sensitivity to bone pathology. Postmortem radiological diagnostics allow supplementing the classical autopsy. This multidisciplinary approach helps visualize a wide variety of pathologies and assist the pathologist in the diagnostic search.
 AIM: To assess the possibility of applying radiological diagnostic methods in the pathological anatomical practice and features of non-invasive autopsy (virtopsy) and its differences from the classical autopsy.
 METHODS: The archival material including macro preparations of two lower limbs with tumor-like masses of unclear genesis (the upper third of the femur and the calcaneal tuber) was used. The biomaterial was previously encased in a specially treated gelatin medium, which ensured its preservation and left parts of the CT scanner intact. Multislice CT was used for radiological assessment of the preparations. From the primary CT sequences obtained, scans with the best visualization in the bone and soft tissue windows were selected, and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was applied. Scans and 3D reconstructions of images of tumor-like masses of the heel and thigh bones were obtained. Interpretation of the borders of the mass, characteristics of morphology and possible source of growth of the neoplasm allowed assuming a malignant nature of the tumor, suggesting its bone origin. Further histologic examination in both cases confirmed the neoplasm (osteogenic sarcoma).
 RESULTS: CT scans and 3D reconstructions of images of tumour-like masses in the heel and femur were obtained. The interpretation of the boundaries of the mass, the morphological characteristics and the possible source of growth of the neoplasm suggested a malignant nature of the tumour, suggesting a bony origin. Further histological evaluation in both cases confirmed the nature of the neoplasm (osteogenic sarcoma).
 CONCLUSIONS: The use of postmortem radiological diagnostic elements provides a sufficiently accurate verification of the nature of some pathologies. However, the absence of tissue damage and disturbances of intact topographic characteristics play not the least role in the postmortem diagnosis. In contrast to autopsy, this technique allows to return to the original appearance of the structures examined and, if necessary, start the diagnostic search anew. Moreover, specialists from other regions can be remotely involved by sending the data of CT scanning.