Multidisciplinary framework for human reliability analysis with an application to errors of commission and dependencies

Barriere, M.T.; Luckas, W.J.; Wreathall, John; Cooper, Susan E.; Bley, Dennis C.; Ramey-Smith, A.

doi:10.2172/106594

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction [64] that considers how performance shaping factors (stress, workload, training) influence the occurrence and type of human error mechanisms to more multi-disciplinary approaches that more fully consider the how human factors, behavioral science and plant engineering contribute to plant conditions that influence not only performance shaping factors, but also specific error mechanisms and unsafe actions ("errors of commission") that contribute to accidents [65,66].…”

Section: Human Reliability Analysis Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Probabilistic basis and assessment methodology for effectiveness of protecting nuclear materials

Duran

2012

2012 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Human Reliability Analysis Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Swain [64] and the NRC multidisciplinary framework [65]). These techniques could support more detailed characterization of some MC&A activities to determine detection probabilities, as well as the development of the MC&A performance data base.…”

Section: Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Probabilistic basis and assessment methodology for effectiveness of protecting nuclear materials

Duran

2012

2012 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, experience has shown, both in simulators and in real events, that the symptoms can mislead operators into taking the wrong actions as discussed in Roth, et al [25]) and Kauffman [36]. During the development of the ATHEANA HRA method, several of these events were examined in detail to identify the kinds of failures that led to the wrong actions being taken (Barriere, et al [37]). This showed that there were a set of somewhat common conditions underlying the kinds of failures seen in the events reviewed.…”

Section: Decision Making In Nuclear Power Plant Operationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An overview of the evolution of human reliability analysis in the context of probabilistic risk assessment.

Bley

Lois

Kolaczkowski

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the Reactor Safety Study in the early 1970's, human reliability analysis (HRA) has been evolving towards a better ability to account for the factors and conditions that can lead humans to take unsafe actions and thereby provide better estimates of the likelihood of human error for probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs). The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of recent reviews of operational events and advances in the behavioral sciences that have impacted the evolution of HRA methods and contributed to improvements. The paper discusses the importance of human errors in complex human-technical systems, examines why humans contribute to accidents and unsafe conditions, and discusses how lessons learned over the years have changed the perspective and approach for modeling human behavior in PRAs of complicated domains such as nuclear power plants. It is argued that it has become increasingly more important to understand and model the more cognitive aspects of human performance and to address the broader range of factors that have been shown to influence human performance in complex domains. The paper concludes by addressing the current ability of HRA to adequately predict human failure events and their likelihood.4

show abstract

“…HRA techniques such as first-generation, a technique for human error rate prediction (THERP), human error assessment and reduction technique (HEART) (Swain and Guttmann 1983), the success-likelihood index method (SLIM) (Embrey et al 1984) as well as human cognition reliability (Hannaman, Spurgin, and Lukic 1985) focus specifically on work properties in HEP estimations and less with the effects of environment and situation (Abrishami et al 2020). The second-generation approaches, including such cognitive reliability and error analysis methods (Hollnagel 1993) and A Technique for Human Error Analysis (Barriere et al 2000), were developed to improve on the design of the first generation. In second-generation methods, operator cognition and context are seen as important contributors to HEP.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An extended human reliability analysing under fuzzy logic environment for ship navigation

Uflaz

Çelik

Aydın

et al. 2022

Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Q2 :The disclosure statement has been inserted. Please correct if this is inaccurate.Response: Yes, it is correct. Q3 :The reference "Castiglia and Giardina 2013" is listed in the references list but is not cited in the text. Please either cite the reference or remove it from the references list.Response: Please remove it. Q4 :The reference "Erdem et al. 2021" is listed in the references list but is not cited in the text. Please either cite the reference or remove it from the references list. Response: It has been inserted into text. Please check. Q5 : Please provide missing city for the reference "Hollnagel 1993" references list entry. Response: Resolved Q6 : Please provide missing city for the reference "Kirwan 1994" references list entry. Response: Resolved Q7 : Please provide missing editors name for reference "Kirwan et al. 2004" references list entry. Response: Resolved Q8 : Please provide missing volume number for reference "Liu et al. 2021" references list entry. Response: No volume number..please leave it like this. Q9 : . Please provide missing city for reference "Saaty, 1980" references list entry. Response: Remove same. Q10 : Please provide missing volume number and page range for reference "Samima and Sarma 2021" references list entry. Response: No have volume number, please leave it like this.Q11 : Please provide missing city for the reference "Zimmermann 2011" references list entry.Response: please remove same.

show abstract

Multidisciplinary framework for human reliability analysis with an application to errors of commission and dependencies

Cited by 7 publications

References 8 publications

Probabilistic basis and assessment methodology for effectiveness of protecting nuclear materials

Probabilistic basis and assessment methodology for effectiveness of protecting nuclear materials

An overview of the evolution of human reliability analysis in the context of probabilistic risk assessment.

An extended human reliability analysing under fuzzy logic environment for ship navigation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About