2006
DOI: 10.1080/10426910500411736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidroplet Impact Model for Prediction of Residual Stresses in Water Jet Peening of Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At an impact speed of 500 m/s, after 4 impacts, the maximum residual compressive stress is -345 MPa (-1.06R p0.2 ) and is obtained at 0.07 mm under the surface, and the depth of the compressive stress zone is 0.2 mm. Rajesh 49,50 performed multi-droplet impact FE-modelling to predict the residual stresses due to water jet peening for three grades of aluminium. For this modelling approach, a transient elastoplastic finite element analysis is used by considering the impingement of a set of droplets in succession to one another over a certain time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At an impact speed of 500 m/s, after 4 impacts, the maximum residual compressive stress is -345 MPa (-1.06R p0.2 ) and is obtained at 0.07 mm under the surface, and the depth of the compressive stress zone is 0.2 mm. Rajesh 49,50 performed multi-droplet impact FE-modelling to predict the residual stresses due to water jet peening for three grades of aluminium. For this modelling approach, a transient elastoplastic finite element analysis is used by considering the impingement of a set of droplets in succession to one another over a certain time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades many works have been presented by using numerical methods, especially by the finite element method (FEM). The main subjects include prediction and measurement of residual stresses; residual stresses and deformations in quenching [4][5][6]; prediction of thermal residual stresses [7]; thermo-plasticity and thermo-viscoplasticity for residual stresses [8]; residual stresses and distortions in various quenched components [9][10][11][12][13]; effect of geometry and boundary conditions on residual stresses [14,15], etc. Many measurement methods are used to determine the residual stresses to verify the correctness of the simulation results, such as the hole-drilling method, layer-stripped method, X-ray diffraction method, neutron diffraction method, etc.…”
Section: Thermal-elastic-plastic Simulation Of Internal Stress Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Kunaporn et al [10] proposed a mathematical model capable of predicting critical standoff distance under different WJP conditions. Rajesh et al [11,12] proposed a finite element method that considers the jet pressure distribution of high-velocity droplets impacting on the target surface rather than the stationary pressure distribution, and used ANSYS to simulate the process of WJP on Al6063-T6 alloy; the RS obtained by the simulation model was compared with the experimental results, and the deviation was about 10%. Based on the quasi-static pressure distribution and the nonlinear axial symmetry plane distributed load, Dong et al [13] used ANSYS to simulate the process of WJP on Al2A11 alloy under different pressures, and obtained the distribution of the RS field and the variation law of RS along the layer depth and radial direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work decreased the erosion to a minimum (i.e., erosion can be almost neglected) by increasing jet traverse velocity and adjusting other parameters [6]. In addition, Rajesh [12], Hsu [14], and Cho [16] et al neglected erosion when studying WJP; thus, erosion was neglected in the finite element model. According to the actual diameter of the water jet, a pressure distribution of 0.3 mm in diameter was determined; a target model of 10 mm in length, 8 mm in width, and 3 mm in height ( Figure 5) was established.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%