2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multielement analysis of continental and lacustrine ferromanganese nodules by WDXRF, TXRF, and ICP-MS methods. Intercomparison study and accuracy assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calibration curves were constructed, and accuracy testing was carried out using the geological reference materials of sedimentary, ultramafic, and mafic rocks. This technique was previously successfully applied for the elemental analysis of rocks and sediments [33,34];…”
Section: Description and Preliminary Preparation Of Ceramic Samples F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration curves were constructed, and accuracy testing was carried out using the geological reference materials of sedimentary, ultramafic, and mafic rocks. This technique was previously successfully applied for the elemental analysis of rocks and sediments [33,34];…”
Section: Description and Preliminary Preparation Of Ceramic Samples F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TXRF can be applied for direct analysis of iron, manganese, ferromanganese, nickel-copper sulfide ores, oceanic and lacustrine nodules [Pashkova et al, 2020;Akhmetzhanov et al, 2021;Chubarov et al, 2021]. The suspension preparation (5 mL of 1 % Triton X-100 solution and 20 mg of fine powder with a size <10 μm and internal standard of Ga) gives a possibility for fast reliable determination of major and minor elements by the internal standard method with the recovery values 75-125 %.…”
Section: Application Of Txrf To Geological Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the problems of TXRF analysis is strong peaks overlapping due to poor spectral resolution of the energy-dispersive spectrum. For instance, the differences between the TXRF results and the certified values in CRMs may be more than 30 % for As, Pb, V, Cr, Ba in the nodules due to PbLα/AsKα, BaLα/TiKα, CrKα/VKβ, VKα/TiKβ lines overlapping [Pashkova et al, 2020;Chubarov et al, 2021]. Chemometric approaches may be used to solve this problem [Akhmetzhanov et al, 2021].…”
Section: Application Of Txrf To Geological Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%