2004
DOI: 10.1126/science.1094207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiferroic BaTiO 3 -CoFe 2 O 4 Nanostructures

Abstract: We report on the coupling between ferroelectric and magnetic order parameters in a nanostructured BaTiO3-CoFe2O4 ferroelectromagnet. This facilitates the interconversion of energies stored in electric and magnetic fields and plays an important role in many devices, including transducers, field sensors, etc. Such nanostructures were deposited on single-crystal SrTiO3 (001) substrates by pulsed laser deposition from a single Ba-Ti-Co-Fe-oxide target. The films are epitaxial in-plane as well as out-of-plane with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
984
4
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,118 publications
(1,062 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
19
984
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The saturation magnetization and coercivity evaluated from the magnetic hysteresis loops in Figure 6(a) were about 150 emu cm −3 (normalized to the volume fraction of CoFe 2 O 4 , ~ 20%) and 350 Oe, respectively, regardless of the orientation of the applied magnetic field. In comparison with similar reports [10,16,17], the out of plane coercivity of our sample is relatively small. This behavior can be explained by the following reasons:

the anisotropy is intrinsically small because the CFO nanotubes are short (length: ~250 nm, diameter: ~500 nm)

diffusion or rearrangement of atoms would occur at the interface of CFO and BTO, resulting in the deterioration of the magnetic properties of CFO

the vicinity of superparamagnetic limit should also be considered in our case because the walls of CFO nanotubes are very thin.

…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The saturation magnetization and coercivity evaluated from the magnetic hysteresis loops in Figure 6(a) were about 150 emu cm −3 (normalized to the volume fraction of CoFe 2 O 4 , ~ 20%) and 350 Oe, respectively, regardless of the orientation of the applied magnetic field. In comparison with similar reports [10,16,17], the out of plane coercivity of our sample is relatively small. This behavior can be explained by the following reasons:

the anisotropy is intrinsically small because the CFO nanotubes are short (length: ~250 nm, diameter: ~500 nm)

diffusion or rearrangement of atoms would occur at the interface of CFO and BTO, resulting in the deterioration of the magnetic properties of CFO

the vicinity of superparamagnetic limit should also be considered in our case because the walls of CFO nanotubes are very thin.

…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…These nanocomposites have the potential for applications in a variety of multifunctional devices, such as data storage media, in which magnetization can be reversed by applying an electric field (or vice versa), and microwave frequency transducers where the magneto-electric coupling constant depends on the frequency of applied alternating magnetic field [25]. Although several attempts for fabricating bulk-type multiferroic nanocomposites, by ceramic sintering and hot molding for example, have been reported so far [6,7], much more studies on fabrication of film-type nanocomposites by sol-gel process [8,9] and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [1013] have been recently published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the extensively studied oxide–oxide VAN34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and recently reported metal–oxide VAN,26, 39 the nitride–metal VAN exhibits surprisingly ordered Au nanopillars, forming the APL hybrid systems. The growth of the APL hybrid structure is dominated by the different growth mechanisms of the metal and nitride in the systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Most of the VAN structures have been demonstrated in oxide–oxide systems,34, 35, 36, 37, 38 because of the excellent growth compatibility between the oxide–oxide systems. The growth of nitride–metal plasmonic lattice structures posed significant difficulties due to the large difference in growth kinetics of the two phases, i.e., a metal and a nitride in this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%