2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifractal analysis of geochemical anomalies: A tool for assessing prospectivity at the SE border of the Ossa Morena Zone, Variscan Massif (Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the dynamic viewpoint, the D 2 indicates the complexity of controls underpinning the spatial pattern (Yılmaz and Güler, 2010). A positive Δf(α) suggests that the spectrum is right-hooked, and there are more small values than large ones; otherwise, the dataset has more large values (Arias et al, 2012;Deng et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the dynamic viewpoint, the D 2 indicates the complexity of controls underpinning the spatial pattern (Yılmaz and Güler, 2010). A positive Δf(α) suggests that the spectrum is right-hooked, and there are more small values than large ones; otherwise, the dataset has more large values (Arias et al, 2012;Deng et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the SW method based singularity mapping technique was proposed, it has been successfully proved to be a powerful tool for mineralization associated geochemical anomaly identification (e.g. Cheng, 2004Cheng, , 2007Cheng, , 2012Cheng, , 2014Chen et al, 2007;Cheng et al, 2009aCheng et al, , 2009bCheng and Agterberg, 2009;Arias et al, 2012;Zuo and Cheng, 2008;Zuo et al, 2009Xiao et al, 2012Xiao et al, , 2014 and applied in a wide range of other geo-information anomaly recongnization associated fields such as geophysical exploration Wang et al, 2013a), remote sensing (Cheng, 1999a;Neta et al, 2010), and tectonics data modeling (Wang et al, , 2013bZhao et al, 2014). However, on the one hand, the maximum window size in the SW approach, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of fractal models include the number-size (N-S) model proposed by Mandelbrot [14], the concentration-area (C-A) model of Cheng et al [16], the concentration-perimeter (C-P) model of Cheng et al [17], the concentration-distance (C-D) model proposed by Li et al [18], and the concentrationvolume (C-V) model of Afzal et al [19]. Fractal/multifractal modeling assists in identifying relationships between geological, geochemical, and mineralogical settings and linking them to spatial information obtained from mineral deposits [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Various geochemical and mineralization processes can be defined due to differences in fractal dimensions, based on analysis of relevant geochemical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%