2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifractality and market efficiency of carbon emission trading market: Analysis using the multifractal detrended fluctuation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By looking carefully at the literature on the topic of market efficiency and studies that took placed in this area, it can be seen that several methods have been proposed to examine the market efficiency in carbon markets and we can classify them into several distinct categories. They include methods that rely on variance ratio (VR) tests (Daskalakis and Markellos 2008;Ibikunle et al 2012;Montagnoli and De Vries 2010;Niblock and Harrison 2013;Yang et al 2018;Zhang et al 2020;Zhou et al 2019), cost of carry models (Charles et al 2013;Joyeux and Milunovich 2010), and the profitability of trading strategies (Aatola et al 2014;Daskalakis and Markellos 2008;Daskalakis 2013;Niblock and Harrison 2013), and the methods based on multifractality tests and intermittency coefficient (Fan et al 2019;Sattarhoff and Gronwald 2018). In what follows, we tried to analyze the ideas presented in each of the mentioned studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By looking carefully at the literature on the topic of market efficiency and studies that took placed in this area, it can be seen that several methods have been proposed to examine the market efficiency in carbon markets and we can classify them into several distinct categories. They include methods that rely on variance ratio (VR) tests (Daskalakis and Markellos 2008;Ibikunle et al 2012;Montagnoli and De Vries 2010;Niblock and Harrison 2013;Yang et al 2018;Zhang et al 2020;Zhou et al 2019), cost of carry models (Charles et al 2013;Joyeux and Milunovich 2010), and the profitability of trading strategies (Aatola et al 2014;Daskalakis and Markellos 2008;Daskalakis 2013;Niblock and Harrison 2013), and the methods based on multifractality tests and intermittency coefficient (Fan et al 2019;Sattarhoff and Gronwald 2018). In what follows, we tried to analyze the ideas presented in each of the mentioned studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, phase I and phase III fall short to carries attributes of an efficient market. Fan et al (2019) check the multifractality and efficiency of several pilots in the CO 2 market of China by applying the multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA) method. They evaluate the efficiencies in these markets by utilizing an indicator that they introduced based on the generalized Hurst exponents, and the findings imply prevalent inefficiencies among pilot markets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars also studied the efficiency of China's ETS pilot provinces and cities with respect to the carbon price. Although inefficiency generally exists, the efficiency of most pilot provinces and cities increases over time [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Existing studies mainly focus on evaluating the mechanism of the effect of an ETS on the carbon intensity, carbon emissions, and GDP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is necessary to forecast carbon prices accurately so as to enhance the enthusiasm of market participants. Evidence shows that carbon prices exhibit non-stationarity, nonlinearity, multi-scale and chaos (Fan et al, 2019 ; Huang et al, 2021 ; Manaf et al, 2016 ; Tian & Hao, 2020 ; Zhu et al, 2017 ; Zou & Zhang, 2020 ) and these make predictions difficult. Therefore, capturing features of carbon prices in order to maximise the forecasting precision is of great significance and it has become a challenging task for academic researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%