2011
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.59.943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifragmentation in Reactions of 1-GeV Protons with Iron Nuclei

Abstract: We use combinations of cascade and nuclear de-excitation models to assess the importance of the inclusion of a multifragmentation stage for the quantitative description of the 1-GeV p + 56 Fe spallation reaction. We discuss the sensitivity of several exclusive physical observables to the de-excitation mechanism in the attempt to identify which of them can be considered suitable probes for a multifragmentation stage. The calculations show that the inclusion of a multifragmentation stage is not necessary to cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental spallation cross sections have also been found to be well described by a fast but sequential emission process. [30] One can show that a dynamical sequential decay model can also produce the fragment-fragment correlations expected from simultaneous multifragmentation. [31] Here, at least, the decay of a hot equilibrated compound nucleus could be considered to take place through a fast sequential emission process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental spallation cross sections have also been found to be well described by a fast but sequential emission process. [30] One can show that a dynamical sequential decay model can also produce the fragment-fragment correlations expected from simultaneous multifragmentation. [31] Here, at least, the decay of a hot equilibrated compound nucleus could be considered to take place through a fast sequential emission process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we take j to be the thermal excitation energy, given by the difference between the total excitation energy and its collective rotational component, 30) with I j the moment of inertia, cA j is the level density parameter, with c ≈ 1/7-1/8 Mev −1 and T j the effective temperature, given by…”
Section: Cnr*13mentioning
confidence: 99%