A group of chalcogenopheno[3,2-b]pyrroles,
including
thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole (TP), furo[3,2-b]pyrrole (FP), and selenopheno[3,2-b]pyrrole (SeP),
and thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (TT) electron-donating
units were coupled with a thiophene-flanked diketopyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole (ThDPP) acceptor to generate four donor–acceptor–donor
(D-A-D) semiconducting small molecules (ThDPP-TT, ThDPP-FP, ThDPP-TP, and ThDPP-SeP). This study systematically investigated the differences between
chalcogenopheno[3,2-b]pyrroles and TT. From the characterizations,
chalcogenopheno[3,2-b]pyrrole-containing molecules
showed lower band gaps and binding-energy cold crystallization behavior.
The enthalpies of cold crystallization were correlated with the weight
of the chalcogen in ThDPP-FP, ThDPP-TP,
and ThDPP-SeP, which were evaluated as intermolecular
chalcogen-bond interactions between chalcogen and pyrrole nitrogen
in chalcogenopheno[3,2-b]pyrroles. A stronger chalcogen
bond interaction resulted in stronger self-aggregation in thin films
with thermal treatment, which resulted in a polycrystalline structure
in chalcogenopheno[3,2-b]pyrrole-containing molecules.
For the application in an organic field-effect transistor, all four
molecules showed good performance with the highest hole mobilities
as 6.33 × 10–3 cm2 V–1 s–1 for ThDPP-TT, 2.08 × 10–2 cm2 V–1 s–1 for ThDPP-FP, 1.87 × 10–2 cm2 V–1 s–1 for ThDPP-TP, and 6.32 × 10–3 cm2 V–1 s–1 for ThDPP-SeP, and the change
of mobility is well correlated to the root-mean-square roughness of
the thin films. Overall, all the chalcogenopheno[3,2-b]pyrrole-containing molecules showed lower band gaps, polymorphism,
and better charge transport properties compared to TT-containing molecules,
which motivates replacing TT with chalcogenopheno[3,2-b]pyrroles in conjugated polymers, non-fullerene small molecular acceptors,
and narrow-band-gap donors.