Advances in Metrology for X-Ray and EUV Optics IX 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2570462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifunctional light beam source for surface slope measuring long trace profilers

Abstract: To fully exploit the advantages of fourth-generation synchrotron light sources, diffraction-limited-storage-rings (DLSR) and fully coherent free electron lasers (FELs), beamline mirrors and diffraction grating must be of exceptional quality. To achieve the required mirror and grating quality, the metrology instrumentation and methods used to characterize these challenging optics and, even more so, optical assemblies must also offer exceptional functionality and performance. One of the most widely used slope me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the difference of different modes in the effective lateral resolution can hardly explain the observed significant difference of the low-spatial-frequency variations of the groove density distributions, extracted from the same measurement data, but processed with different algorithms. We can speculate that the observed difference may also relate to a difference in the systematic error and spatial resolution of the LTP-II in the different operation/data processing modes [3] (see also discussion in Ref. [11]).…”
Section: The Results Of the Ltp-ii Measurements With The Lcls Gratingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the difference of different modes in the effective lateral resolution can hardly explain the observed significant difference of the low-spatial-frequency variations of the groove density distributions, extracted from the same measurement data, but processed with different algorithms. We can speculate that the observed difference may also relate to a difference in the systematic error and spatial resolution of the LTP-II in the different operation/data processing modes [3] (see also discussion in Ref. [11]).…”
Section: The Results Of the Ltp-ii Measurements With The Lcls Gratingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The major observation from the LTP-II measurements with the grating is the strong correlation between the LTP-II mode of operation and the residual (after subtraction of the best-fit 1 st -or 3 rd -order polynomial functions) groove density variation. The smaller residual variation corresponds to the operation modes the SGB/GMF and PBI/SOPF with lower spatial resolution [3,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations