Multifunctional Monitoring: is it Possible to Simultaneously Evaluate Blood Pressure and Sleep‐Disordered Breathing?

Abstract

Objective Carry out a comparative assessment of respiratory performance, based on multifunctional monitoring (MFM) and the recommended practice for complete polysomnography (PSG), and evaluate the effect of the blood pressure (BP) measurements in MFM on the quality of sleep.Materials and Methods At the first stage, 22 healthy volunteers (control group) underwent concomitant PSG and MFM, and 14 patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) underwent only PSG. At the second stage, concomitant PSG and MFM were performed in patients with confirmed SDB.Results In the control group, MFM detected a lower level of SpO2, a lower desaturation index (DI), and a higher apnea index (AI) than in the PSG group. However, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was comparable in both groups. During concomitant PSG-MFM, the measurements of BP increased the number of micro-arousals only in the SDB group.Conclusion Results of the assessment of respiratory performance in MFM are comparable in both groups. The detected features of MFM indicators in the evaluation of the chest movements using rheopneumography, criteria different from that generally used for desaturation and hypoxemia, can lead to underestimation of desaturation and DI and underestimation of AI in the control group. The measurements of BP during sleep induced micro-arousals in the SDB group.