2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifunctional polypropylene composites produced by incorporation of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
355
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 506 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
11
355
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphite is usually recognized as the best conductive filler because of its good thermal conductivity, low cost and fair dispersability in polymer matrix (Causin et al, 2006) and (Tu & Ye, 2009). Single graphene sheets constituting graphite show intrinsically high thermal conductivity of about 800 W/m K (Liu et al, 2008) or higher (theoretically estimated to be as high as 5300 W/m K ( Veca et al, 2009) and (Stankovich et al, 2006)), this determining the high thermal conductivity of graphite, usually reported in the range from 100 to 400 W/m K. Expanded graphite (EG), an exfoliated form of graphite with layers of 20-100 nm thickness, has also been used in polymer composites (Ganguli et al, 2008), for which the thermal conductivity depends on the exfoliation degree (Park et al, 2008), its dispersion in matrix and the aspect ratio of the EG (Kalaitzidou et al, 2007).…”
Section: Carbon-based Fillersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphite is usually recognized as the best conductive filler because of its good thermal conductivity, low cost and fair dispersability in polymer matrix (Causin et al, 2006) and (Tu & Ye, 2009). Single graphene sheets constituting graphite show intrinsically high thermal conductivity of about 800 W/m K (Liu et al, 2008) or higher (theoretically estimated to be as high as 5300 W/m K ( Veca et al, 2009) and (Stankovich et al, 2006)), this determining the high thermal conductivity of graphite, usually reported in the range from 100 to 400 W/m K. Expanded graphite (EG), an exfoliated form of graphite with layers of 20-100 nm thickness, has also been used in polymer composites (Ganguli et al, 2008), for which the thermal conductivity depends on the exfoliation degree (Park et al, 2008), its dispersion in matrix and the aspect ratio of the EG (Kalaitzidou et al, 2007).…”
Section: Carbon-based Fillersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and PTC membranes The incorporation of graphene-based materials such as graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs), GNSs, and GO can significantly reduce gas permeation through a polymer composite [9,[47][48][49][50]. A percolating network of graphene nanoplatelets or nanosheets can increase tortuosity, which inhibits molecular diffusion through the matrix, thus resulting in significantly reduced permeability [9].…”
Section: Gas Barrier and Optical Clarity Of Pmmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable n shown here is an adaptation for the case of platelet shaped fillers and is a function of the filler's aspect ratio, a. assumptions of the Halpin-Tsai equation include perfect exfoliation to attain the aspect ratio input into Eq. 5, as well as perfect contact between filler and matrix (Kalaitzidou et al 2007b). For the case of xGnP 5 , variables E f and a were taken as 1 TPa and 500, respectively.…”
Section: Flexural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%