“…Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with an inverted (p–i–n) structure exhibit some advantages compared to those with a regular (n–i–p) structure, including a higher recorded photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) up to 26.14%, higher filling factor (FF), and smaller hysteresis efficacy. − In the p–i–n structure, the hole-transport layer (HTL) plays essential roles in separating electrons and holes and in preventing direct contact between the perovskite active layer and the electrode, which may result in Schottky contact . At present, organic HTL materials have been successfully developed in p–i–n-type PSCs, including triphenylamine polymer (PTAA) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS). − Nevertheless, increased acidity and hygroscopicity of these organic HTL materials lead to unsatisfactory long-term stability of PSCs. − Therefore, various inorganic alternatives, such as copper iodide (CuI), nickel oxide (NiO), molybdenum oxide (MoO 3 ), and copper sulfide (CuS), have been designed in p–i–n-type PSCs to offset the shortcomings of organic HTL materials. − Especially, NiO films exhibit the merits of high stability, excellent optical transmittance (∼90%), low cost, matched valence band with perovskite (5.0–5.4 vs ∼5.4 eV), and appropriate work function (4.5–5.6 eV). − For instance, Zhu et al.…”