1992
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(92)90299-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multigrid acceleration and turbulence models for computations of 3D turbulent jets in crossflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reynolds stress models, i.e. solving transport equations for the Reynolds stresses, reproduce peak vorticity and CRVP strength very well, and predict Reynolds stresses better than k − ε models (Demuren 1992). Crabb, Duarão & Whitelaw (1981) and Andreopoulos (1982) found regions of high streamline curvature, where the flow is locally anisotropic.…”
Section: Canonical Round Jet In Crossflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reynolds stress models, i.e. solving transport equations for the Reynolds stresses, reproduce peak vorticity and CRVP strength very well, and predict Reynolds stresses better than k − ε models (Demuren 1992). Crabb, Duarão & Whitelaw (1981) and Andreopoulos (1982) found regions of high streamline curvature, where the flow is locally anisotropic.…”
Section: Canonical Round Jet In Crossflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggested that excurrent jets for small clams were more erect and the bulk mean crossflow had more of a tendency to deflect around the jet (Andreopoulos & Rodi 1984), the wake vortices were more dominant than the shear layer vortices (Fric & Roshko 1994, Meyer et al 2007, and the counter-rotating vortex pair was more dominant than the horseshoe vortices (Jabbal & Zhong 2008, Sau & Mahesh 2008. In contrast, excurrent jets for the larger clams were more severely bent over and the bulk mean crossflow tended to deflect over the jet (Andreopoulos & Rodi 1984, Demuren 1992, the shear layer vortices were more dominant with respect to the wake vortices (Fric & Roshko 1994, Meyer et al 2007, and the hairpin vortices were more dominant with respect to the counter rotating vortex pair (Jabbal & Zhong 2008, Sau & Mahesh 2008.…”
Section: Influence Of Siphon Flow On the Plumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggested that excurrent jets for small clams were more erect and the bulk mean crossflow had more of a tendency to deflect around the jet (Andreopoulos & Rodi 1984), the wake vortices were more dominant than the shear layer vortices (Fric & Roshko 1994, Meyer et al 2007, and the counter-rotating vortex pair was more dominant than the horseshoe vortices (Jabbal & Zhong 2008, Sau & Mahesh 2008. In contrast, excurrent jets for the larger clams were more severely bent over and the bulk mean crossflow tended to deflect over the jet (Andreopoulos & Rodi 1984, Demuren 1992, the shear layer vortices were more dominant with respect to the wake vortices (Fric & Roshko 1994, Meyer et al 2007, and the hairpin vortices were more dominant with respect to the counter rotating vortex pair (Jabbal & Zhong 2008, Sau & Mahesh 2008.We also found that at the smallest bulk mean crossflow velocity, the jet-to-crossflow velocity ratio was larger than the other bulk mean crossflow velocities used here. In this small bulk mean crossflow velocity case, the jet-to-crossflow velocity ratio indicated dominance of the counter rotating vortex pair (Sau & Mahesh 2008), dominance of the wake vortices (Fric & Roshko 1994, Meyer et al 2007, and a more erect jet with bulk mean crossflow deflecting around the jet (Andreopoulos & Rodi 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the subject of round and square jets in crossflow has been studied both experimentally and numerically over the years. Most of these studies focused on the global flow behavior of the jet, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The vortex systems observed in the structure of round jet in crossflow have also been the subject of other experimental and numerical studies [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%