2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2015.0408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilabel statistical shape prior for image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This occurs, for example, when there is manual selection of points [25,26,65]. Another option is deining additional vertices, called terminals, which are initially connected with all vertices of the graph and each one represents a class [6,36,46].…”
Section: Graph-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This occurs, for example, when there is manual selection of points [25,26,65]. Another option is deining additional vertices, called terminals, which are initially connected with all vertices of the graph and each one represents a class [6,36,46].…”
Section: Graph-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a pair of neighboring vertices representing pixels, the weight of the edge connecting them must relect the probability of the pair belonging to the same class. In this case, the similarity of pixel intensity is the most widely used factor [6,25,36,46,64,65,82]. On the edges connecting vertices representing pixels and terminal vertices, the weight relects the probability that the vertex belongs to the terminal class.…”
Section: Graph-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, plenty of work has been developed prior to the advent of deep learning for segmentation given variational approaches. Multi-atlas based approaches and machine learning based techniques were also ways to integrate prior information through relying on labeled data [2]. However, there is no straightforward way to transfer these previous works to deep learning networks, since the latter have some specific constraints including differentiability and optimization of the loss function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully automatic methods in [5], [6] consist in first finding the approximate shape using a detect and connect approach, and then a classifier is trained to find short segments of the esophagus which are approximated by an elliptical model. In [7] the approach makes use of a training set of manually contoured images to build a shape prior, which is incorporated into a graph cut framework. However the shape model was unidimensional and not fully leveraging the training set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%