Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Historically, the ability to perform intervention on multilateral wells has been limited. While multilateral (ML) well construction technologies have progressed to a high level of reliability, multilateral systems that enabled intervention during the life of well had a more limited track record. Intervention outcomes after prolonged periods of production were less consistent. This lack of technologies with sufficient intervention case histories meant that generally multilateral well architecture was not selected in applications where thru tubing intervention was a requirement. In recent years, multilateral well architecture has continued to increase in demand, with more ML wells drilled and completed in the last five years than any other five-year period in the technology's history. With this increased demand has come industry enthusiasm to further mature its intervention capabilities. This paper will review two recent case histories of separate multilateral well completion systems that enable intervention. This opens up new potential for the industry to take advantage of the cost reductions achieved with multilaterals in a much larger scope of well applications. Two separate completion systems will be covered in this paper, System A installed in a cemented multilateral junction and system B, a completion that creates a hydraulically isolated junction via either a dual string completion or a single string completion that splits into two strings. These case histories were exectuted in 2017 to 2019, and interventions were performed after one to two years of production. Detailed in each case study will be an overview of the equipment, the operational sequence, intervention outcome, and any lessons learned or improvements. The systems have demonstrated themselves as a reliable method to access laterals in non-ideal downhole environments where debris is present after the well has been on production. The tubing sizes for the case studies are 3-1/2" and 4-1/2". In each of these wells, the following operations have been successfully performed: drift testing, acid stimulation through coil tubing and breaking of a ceramic disc. Both slickline and coil tubing have been used for the interventions and in some cases with tractors. Junction inclinations range from 1 to 43 degrees. Plans for ongoing installations for the systems are being executed in the Middle East Region. Further, expansion of the system A capabilities by integrating it with other existing technologies is also planned. This will enable projects such as the installation of a trilateral well with flow control and intervention for each individual leg, and also the conversion of existing single bore wells to multilateral with intervention capability.
Historically, the ability to perform intervention on multilateral wells has been limited. While multilateral (ML) well construction technologies have progressed to a high level of reliability, multilateral systems that enabled intervention during the life of well had a more limited track record. Intervention outcomes after prolonged periods of production were less consistent. This lack of technologies with sufficient intervention case histories meant that generally multilateral well architecture was not selected in applications where thru tubing intervention was a requirement. In recent years, multilateral well architecture has continued to increase in demand, with more ML wells drilled and completed in the last five years than any other five-year period in the technology's history. With this increased demand has come industry enthusiasm to further mature its intervention capabilities. This paper will review two recent case histories of separate multilateral well completion systems that enable intervention. This opens up new potential for the industry to take advantage of the cost reductions achieved with multilaterals in a much larger scope of well applications. Two separate completion systems will be covered in this paper, System A installed in a cemented multilateral junction and system B, a completion that creates a hydraulically isolated junction via either a dual string completion or a single string completion that splits into two strings. These case histories were exectuted in 2017 to 2019, and interventions were performed after one to two years of production. Detailed in each case study will be an overview of the equipment, the operational sequence, intervention outcome, and any lessons learned or improvements. The systems have demonstrated themselves as a reliable method to access laterals in non-ideal downhole environments where debris is present after the well has been on production. The tubing sizes for the case studies are 3-1/2" and 4-1/2". In each of these wells, the following operations have been successfully performed: drift testing, acid stimulation through coil tubing and breaking of a ceramic disc. Both slickline and coil tubing have been used for the interventions and in some cases with tractors. Junction inclinations range from 1 to 43 degrees. Plans for ongoing installations for the systems are being executed in the Middle East Region. Further, expansion of the system A capabilities by integrating it with other existing technologies is also planned. This will enable projects such as the installation of a trilateral well with flow control and intervention for each individual leg, and also the conversion of existing single bore wells to multilateral with intervention capability.
For a quarter of a century sustained technological advances in multilateral technology have enhanced economics and extended the production life of fields in the Middle East. This was accomplished by evolving to meet the demands of increasingly complex applications. Over this history, multilateral applications have evolved from standard Level 2 and Level 4 dual-laterals to dual-laterals with intelligent flow control, intervention capabilities, and improved junction integrity. The use of multilateral technology can deliver a significant increase in reservoir contact compared to single horizontal wells. A dual-lateral well can deliver twice the reservoir contact while eliminating the drilling, casing, and cementing of an additional vertical wellbore section. Operators are implementing multilateral field strategies to reduce overall development cost, cycle times, and carbon footprint. Further benefits include delivery of wells and facility systems using fewer in-field construction hours at a lower baseline cost. This paper discusses several multilateral installations in the Middle East over a 25-year period. It highlights the continuous improvement of multilateral technology used in the region by demonstrating how a multilateral well strategy reduces time-intensive operations by eliminating additional vertical wellbore sections and utilizing existing infrastructure. The case study will include discussion of workover intervention operations, completions, and lateral creation systems. The application of a multilateral strategy is a proven method to reduce time intensive operations by eliminating additional vertical wellbore sections and utilizing existing infrastructure. This paper will focus on the continuous improvement of multilateral technology to consistently meet challenges faced by operators in the Middle East region for over two decades. Wells originally drilled as standard Level 4 dual-laterals are now drilled and completed using intelligent flow control and, in some cases, Level 5 installations with pressure-controlled junctions. The paper focuses on a region and the technology used to increase efficiencies, enabling the delivery of increased reservoir contact in less operational days. The paper also provides insight as to methodology for continually improving reliability of multilateral installations to maximize efficiencies.
This paper provides an overview of an analytical method to assess tubing loads, design integrity, and buckling behavior under complex mechanical, pressure, and thermal-loading conditions. The methodology uses a proven tubular design and stress analysis software, applied to a multi-zone intelligent completion and a dual string TAML level 5 multilateral well. Tubing load scenarios are evaluated in separate phases of the completion installation and operating phases. Simultaneous production and injection scenarios are also examined for a dual string multilateral well. Full well models are created and evaluated, analyzing stress-loading for both well types. Thermal simulation is first performed, followed by tubular stress modeling to guide tubular selection and completion design. Analysis covers completion operations during installation such as packer setting and testing, well operation scenarios such as well stimulation, simultaneous production / injection for the dual string multilateral, and production scenarios for the multi-zone intelligent completion with multi-position Interval Control Valves (ICVs) in various positions. Results presented show temperature/pressure changes for each simulated scenario and the corresponding load state cases in the modeled wells. Tubular axial loading, burst and collapse limitations, pipe movement and buckling potential are modeled. The resultant forces on completion packers are modeled for the well with the multi-zone intelligent completion. These results are evaluated to select and optimize the well completion design and also identify well operating limits with respect to a set of combined ICV positions during commingled well operations. Results on estimated annular pressure buildup during well operations are also presented with some guidelines on minimizing annular pressure buildup in annuli through mechanical control or well completion landing practices. This paper provides workflow outlines and results for tubing stress analysis in complex multi-zone intelligent completion and dual completion multilateral wells. Variations in operating temperatures and pressures in such scenarios can place completions in conditions that can exceed design margins that are already limited due to production-casing diameter constraints. The methods and results presented are useful for balancing design-versus-risk for the completion. They can also provide savings by optimizing well design to meet design integrity standards without being overdesigned.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.