Abstract:Recent initiatives of China and other emerging powers to create new multilateral development lending institutions (MDLIs) are often portrayed as efforts to build upon and/or reform an idea pioneered by Western officials during the Bretton Woods negotiations. However, recent literature has shown that support for MDLIs also had deeper non‐Western roots in the pre‐Bretton Woods era. What led thinkers outside the West to propose MDLIs in that earlier period? How might their ideas be relevant to current non‐Western… Show more
“…As one of the few globally significant economies where a large part of the financial system remains subject to state control, the history of the PRC's efforts to contest financial globalisation using a nondeliverable currency offers a unique insight into efforts to mitigate the unfunded liability problem. The origins of non-delivery and the preference for capital controls can be traced to Republican-era concerns over the profits made by foreign banks (Helleiner 2019). While these concerns remain, this section shows how volatilities in the international financial system, loopholes in its architecture and the decline of international currencies provided China with an opportunity to use state settlement banks as an interface for contesting financial integration.…”
Section: Internationalising a Non-deliverable Currency Using State Settlement Banksmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since the early 2000s, China's international debt as a percentage of GDP declined and about one-third of foreign debt is denominated in RMB (SAFE 2019). Addressing one of the major historical concerns of non-Western economies in the establishment of Bretton Woods Helleiner 2019), China has also succeeded in limiting the share of claims of foreign-owned banks and it has reduced its dependence on FDI in capital formation (Figure 6).…”
Section: State Settlement Banks and Offshore Liquidity Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical political economy has debunked many of the monetary policy limitations long associated with being an anchor currency by focusing on how financial innovation and offshore markets served to solidify US structural power (Konings 2008, Strange 1988, Helleiner 1994. These developments can be traced to a failure in the run up to Bretton Woods to develop inclusive multinational institutions that would allay the concerns of non-Western countries including China regarding the exploitative role of foreign banks (Helleiner 2019).…”
The existence of an uncovered liability has historically benefited foreign banks and lead currencies. Using the case of China's efforts to fund its foreign exchange needs by exploiting loopholes in the international financial architecture, the paper examines whether using state-owned settlement banks as a means of intermediating a specialised 'nondeliverable' financial asset in offshore markets can substitute the institutional and technical prerequisites that developing economies typically lack. The findings show that while offshore money markets can reduce US dollar dependency in areas such as trade invoicing that do not depend on currency delivery, increasing the offshore holdings of RMB is more challenging. The reasons for this are to be found in the way the governance, geographic and credit generating limitations of state settlement banks reinforce the constraints imposed by the uncovered liability problem. The findings distinguish the historical evolution of the RMB's offshore use from other offshore markets and reinforce the impossibility of separating issues related to trade infrastructures from those related to the structure of the international financial system.
“…As one of the few globally significant economies where a large part of the financial system remains subject to state control, the history of the PRC's efforts to contest financial globalisation using a nondeliverable currency offers a unique insight into efforts to mitigate the unfunded liability problem. The origins of non-delivery and the preference for capital controls can be traced to Republican-era concerns over the profits made by foreign banks (Helleiner 2019). While these concerns remain, this section shows how volatilities in the international financial system, loopholes in its architecture and the decline of international currencies provided China with an opportunity to use state settlement banks as an interface for contesting financial integration.…”
Section: Internationalising a Non-deliverable Currency Using State Settlement Banksmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since the early 2000s, China's international debt as a percentage of GDP declined and about one-third of foreign debt is denominated in RMB (SAFE 2019). Addressing one of the major historical concerns of non-Western economies in the establishment of Bretton Woods Helleiner 2019), China has also succeeded in limiting the share of claims of foreign-owned banks and it has reduced its dependence on FDI in capital formation (Figure 6).…”
Section: State Settlement Banks and Offshore Liquidity Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical political economy has debunked many of the monetary policy limitations long associated with being an anchor currency by focusing on how financial innovation and offshore markets served to solidify US structural power (Konings 2008, Strange 1988, Helleiner 1994. These developments can be traced to a failure in the run up to Bretton Woods to develop inclusive multinational institutions that would allay the concerns of non-Western countries including China regarding the exploitative role of foreign banks (Helleiner 2019).…”
The existence of an uncovered liability has historically benefited foreign banks and lead currencies. Using the case of China's efforts to fund its foreign exchange needs by exploiting loopholes in the international financial architecture, the paper examines whether using state-owned settlement banks as a means of intermediating a specialised 'nondeliverable' financial asset in offshore markets can substitute the institutional and technical prerequisites that developing economies typically lack. The findings show that while offshore money markets can reduce US dollar dependency in areas such as trade invoicing that do not depend on currency delivery, increasing the offshore holdings of RMB is more challenging. The reasons for this are to be found in the way the governance, geographic and credit generating limitations of state settlement banks reinforce the constraints imposed by the uncovered liability problem. The findings distinguish the historical evolution of the RMB's offshore use from other offshore markets and reinforce the impossibility of separating issues related to trade infrastructures from those related to the structure of the international financial system.
“…Historically, LAC has been deeply committed to multilateralism, which in the global South is often 'measured in terms of membership' (Braveboy-Wagner, 2009) of IGOs. Unbeknownst to many, the World Bank has well-documented roots in the institutional models and diplomatic initiatives of LAC, including Uruguay (Helleiner, 2017(Helleiner, , 2019Mendez & Turzi, 2020;Villaseñor, 1941). It is thought-provoking that the NDB can trace some of its own roots back to Latin America.…”
Section: Ac Agency In Multil Ater Alism: a Gold Standard For The Ndbmentioning
This study provides insight into the current evolution of the New Development Bank (NDB). It examines the role of the agency of the global South reshaping intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) in the case of Brazil's influence on the NDB to expand its membership. In that process, this article homes in on the admission of Uruguay to the NDB as a prospective member in September 2021, the first case of NDB expansion into Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). The study shows that the membership negotiations between Montevideo and the Bank were less rigid and formal than the procedural norms of multilateral development banks (MDBs) of the North, thanks to the collaborative agency by the various LAC actors involved. It makes the case that Uruguay's accession to the NDB will produce numerous win‐win benefits for both the country and the Bank. It also argues that the membership will inspire the future accession of other countries in the LAC region to the Bank. The study adds to the scant literature which conceptualizes the mechanics of membership expansion by small or new IGOs. The piece also adds to existing studies investigating how LAC agency has previously shaped and continues to shape MDBs.
“…The emergence of the BRICS and MIKTA, the establishment of the New Development Bank, and the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) have expedited the shift from neoliberalism to new standards of cooperation through transformation since the early 2010s. This countermovement can be understood as an expression of challenge towards the institutional density of existing international bodies (Wang 2019; Morse and Keohane 2014;Lipscy 2017;Helleiner 2019). Although this challenge may have undermined the authority and legitimacy of current institutions, this does not directly signify that existing bodies are to completely fade away with the advent of these new rival organizations.…”
Section: Opportunities For New Modes Of Cooperationmentioning
This study illustrates collaborative platforms and diversifying partnerships for South-South and triangular cooperation in development. The English School's pluralism-solidarism spectrum is applied as a tool to explain transformative features of the changing international society in times of crisis. The study focuses on the intermediary pluralist-solidarism phase that shows dynamics of middle power coalitions using nation branding and collaborative governance as key strategies. The transitional phase is exemplified by two approaches. One is the bilateral approach to coalition shown through the case of China, whereas the other is the inclusivemultilateral approach demonstrated through the case of South Korea. Implications are given toward relatively loose networks that have the potential to evolve into platforms with institutional grounds, especially for middle powers seeking opportunities in the new normal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.