Multilayer mobility management for all-IP networks: pure SIP vs. hybrid SIP/mobile IP

Politis, Christos; Chew, K.A.; Tafazolli, Rahim

doi:10.1109/vetecs.2003.1208841

Cited by 31 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In [15], the authors used SIP for real time and MIP for non-real time services. The authors also made a simulation study of handoff performance based on packet loss ratio for SIP and MIP.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

SHIP: Cross-layer mobility management scheme based on Session Initiation Protocol and Host Identity Protocol

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the all-IP wireless networks, mobility management is a crucial issue, and it can be operated at different layers in the traditional Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) stack. Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is an application layer protocol used for the signaling and the mobility management without any modifications of the lower layer protocols, especially in the voice over IP environment. However, since it always gets the lowest priority in the networking model, it will produce the large handoff latency, the packet loss, and the handoff blocking probability. To provide an efficient mobility management, SIP can be combined with other protocols. In this paper, we propose a cross-layer mobility management scheme based on SIP and the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) which is a new protocol designed to provide secure and continuous communications between two nodes by separating the identifier and the locator roles of the traditional IP address. In the proposed scheme, the mobile node and the correspondent node use their host identity tags to establish the session connections, and the mobile nodes uses the HIP location update scheme instead of the SIP location update scheme to update its IP address when it moves to a new subnet. We discuss the proposed scheme's architecture and the major mobility procedures, including the session setup, the handoff and the location update in this paper. We also develop an analytical model to study the handoff performance of the proposed scheme, the typical SIP, and the hybrid SIP/Mobile IP, respectively. The analytical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme outperforms the typical SIP and the hybrid

show abstract

“…In [15], the authors used SIP for real time and MIP for non-real time services. The authors also made a simulation study of handoff performance based on packet loss ratio for SIP and MIP.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

SHIP: Cross-layer mobility management scheme based on Session Initiation Protocol and Host Identity Protocol

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Politis et al [11] described the concept of hybrid Session Initiation Protocol and Mobile IP with joint mobility scheme addressed in different contexts. A MIP stack on top of which SIP resides could exploit the architecture as if using two superimposed worlds: the MIP world and the SIP world in a synchronized and aligned fashion.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new MIP-SIP interworking scheme

Andersson

Elkotob

Åhlund

2008

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a new interworking scheme for Mobile IP and the Session Initiation Protocol being the most popular solutions for mobility management at the network and application layers respectively. The goal is to deliver seamless mobility for both TCP-based and UDP-based applications taking the best features from each mobility management scheme. In short, this paper proposes that TCP connections are handled through Mobile IP while UDP-based connection-less applications may use the Session Initiation Protocol for handling mobility. The two mobility management solutions are integrated into one common solution.

show abstract

“…Table 1 compares the existing MM protocols that have so far been reviewed: MIP, SCTP, and SIP. We may also refer to [18] and [19] for more detailed descriptions of MIP, SCTP, and SIP.…”

Section: Session Initiation Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobility management requirements and framework for systems beyond IMT-2000

Jung

Koh

2005

J. Commun. Netw.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses mobility management (MM) requirements and framework for systems beyond IMT-2000 (SBI2K), based on the standardization works that has so far been done in ITU-T study group 19. We first identify the requirements for MM in SBI2K. Based on the identified MM requirements, we describe the MM framework for location management and handover management for SBI2K. We then review and analyze some of the existing IP-based MM protocols. From the analysis and comparison, we see that the existing MM schemes cannot meet all of the MM requirements for SBI2K. It is naturally concluded that further work is needed to enhance the available MM schemes SBI2K.

show abstract

Multilayer mobility management for all-IP networks: pure SIP vs. hybrid SIP/mobile IP

Cited by 31 publications

References 1 publication

SHIP: Cross-layer mobility management scheme based on Session Initiation Protocol and Host Identity Protocol

SHIP: Cross-layer mobility management scheme based on Session Initiation Protocol and Host Identity Protocol

A new MIP-SIP interworking scheme

Mobility management requirements and framework for systems beyond IMT-2000

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About