2006
DOI: 10.1021/ma061815g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilayered Films Fabricated from Combinations of Degradable Polyamines:  Tunable Erosion and Release of Anionic Polyelectrolytes

Abstract: This investigation sought to develop methods that permit broad and tunable control over the erosion of multilayered polyelectrolyte assemblies and the release of anionic polymers in physiologically relevant media. We report the fabrication and characterization of multilayered films ~60 nm thick using sodium poly(styrene sulfonate) (SPS) and different combinations of three different hydrolytically degradable polyamines (1-3). We investigated two different approaches to film fabrication: 1) fabrication using sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described above, we have demonstrated in past studies [35,36] that hydrolytically degradable polymer 1 can be used to fabricate films that erode and sustain the release of anionic polymers from surfaces, generally over periods of ∼ 48 h. As an extension of this work, we demonstrated recently that small changes in the structure of this polymer influence the functional properties of multilayered films and allow measures of temporal control over rates of film erosion and the release of incorporated anionic polymers. [39][40][41] Using sodium poly(styrene sulfonate) (SPS) as a model anionic polymer, we demonstrated that film erosion could be extended by systematically increasing polyamine hydrophobicity. [39] For example, whereas films fabricated from polymer 1 erode and release SPS over a period of ∼ 2 days, films fabricated from polymers 2 and 3-which are more hydrophobic and degrade more slowly than polymer 1-release SPS for prolonged periods (e.g., for up to 6 days and 14 days, respec-tively) when incubated in PBS.…”
Section: Tunable Erosion Of Hydrolytically Degradable Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As described above, we have demonstrated in past studies [35,36] that hydrolytically degradable polymer 1 can be used to fabricate films that erode and sustain the release of anionic polymers from surfaces, generally over periods of ∼ 48 h. As an extension of this work, we demonstrated recently that small changes in the structure of this polymer influence the functional properties of multilayered films and allow measures of temporal control over rates of film erosion and the release of incorporated anionic polymers. [39][40][41] Using sodium poly(styrene sulfonate) (SPS) as a model anionic polymer, we demonstrated that film erosion could be extended by systematically increasing polyamine hydrophobicity. [39] For example, whereas films fabricated from polymer 1 erode and release SPS over a period of ∼ 2 days, films fabricated from polymers 2 and 3-which are more hydrophobic and degrade more slowly than polymer 1-release SPS for prolonged periods (e.g., for up to 6 days and 14 days, respec-tively) when incubated in PBS.…”
Section: Tunable Erosion Of Hydrolytically Degradable Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] In addition to the use of polymers 1-3 to extend the erosion of multilayered films, we have also demonstrated that it is possible to tune more broadly the range of times over which these films release anionic polymers by fabricating films using different blends and combinations of polymers 1, 2, or 3. [41] For example, films having the general structure (1/SPS) n (2/ SPS) m (i.e., fabricated using different numbers of layers of polymer 1 and polymer 2) eroded and released SPS with profiles that were intermediate to those of films fabricated from SPS and polymers 1 or 2 alone (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Tunable Erosion Of Hydrolytically Degradable Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such control over the proportion of a particular component can, in turn, lead to tunable morphology, thickness, and degradation profiles. [16][17][18][19][20][21]23,29] For example, by blending PSS and PAA and alternately depositing this blend with PAH, the film composition can be precisely controlled. [17] Further, we demonstrated that by slightly varying the adsorption conditions, the composition of multilayers assembled using a blend of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) oligonucleotides and PSS alternating with PAH could be varied substantially.…”
Section: Film Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Lynn and coworkers on blends of degradable polyamines with varying alkyl spacer length also found that the film composition can affect the macroscopic properties of the film. [29] In this case, the behavior of the final film was dominated by the more hydrophobic polyamine, where intermediate ratios of hydrophilic to hydrophobic polyamines were used in the adsorption solutions (from 25-90 % hydrophilic polymer). It was only at high fractions of hydrophilic polymer (above 98 %) that the film started to show intermediate polarity.…”
Section: Feature Articlementioning
confidence: 99%