2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12065-017-0152-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel image thresholding using entropy of histogram and recently developed population-based metaheuristic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 12 gives the Chi-square (χ 2 ) value and p-value of Friedman test at different threshold levels. According to the Chi-square distribution table, the critical value for 5 (6 algorithm -1) degrees of freedom at 0.05 significant level is 11.07 [57]. It can be observed from the table that the Chi-square values obtained are much larger than the critical value and the p-values obtained are much smaller than the significant level.…”
Section: Statistical Testmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 12 gives the Chi-square (χ 2 ) value and p-value of Friedman test at different threshold levels. According to the Chi-square distribution table, the critical value for 5 (6 algorithm -1) degrees of freedom at 0.05 significant level is 11.07 [57]. It can be observed from the table that the Chi-square values obtained are much larger than the critical value and the p-values obtained are much smaller than the significant level.…”
Section: Statistical Testmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this section, all available thresholding approaches are compared at K=10, 15, and 20 to assess the performance on high dimensional tasks. Threshold levels selected are the same as [57]. The average fitness function values obtained are presented in Table 14 (bold is the best).…”
Section: Search Capability On High Dimensional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chi-square χ 2 value and p-value are presented in Table 10. According to the chi-square distribution table, the critical value for 7 (8 algorithms − 1) degrees of freedom with 5% significant level is 14.067 [67,68]. As shown in Table 10, the chi-square values obtained at all threshold levels were much larger than the critical value, and the p-values acquired for all number of thresholds were far less than 0.05.…”
Section: Statistical Testsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Friedman test is a non-parametric statistical hypothesis test. It is applied to investigate whether there is a meaningful statistical difference among the results, and to compare and validate the performance of algorithms [65]. Due to stochastic and random characteristics of CCTC1, CCTC2, and CCRL algorithms, this statistical test is required.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Behavioural Conformance Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of ranking is the first step in the Friedman test. Average ranking is applied to rank each algorithm, and equal values are given to the average ranks [65]. Table 8 shows the ranks for each of the employed algorithms.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Behavioural Conformance Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%