2019
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2019016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel quasi-Monte Carlo integration with product weights for elliptic PDEs with lognormal coefficients

Abstract: We analyze the convergence rate of a multilevel quasi-Monte Carlo (MLQMC) Finite Element Method (FEM) for a scalar diffusion equation with log-Gaussian, isotropic coefficients in a bounded, polytopal domain D ⊂ R d . The multilevel algorithm Q * L which we analyze here was first proposed, in the case of parametric PDEs with sequences of independent, uniformly distributed parameters in Kuo et al. (Found. Comput. Math. 15 (2015) 411-449). The random coefficient is assumed to admit a representation with locally s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent developments in this field can e.g. be found in [32,33,36,38] for the model problem with a lognormal coefficient. Some ideas on a posteriori adaptivity for Monte Carlo methods can e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent developments in this field can e.g. be found in [32,33,36,38] for the model problem with a lognormal coefficient. Some ideas on a posteriori adaptivity for Monte Carlo methods can e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that to handle singularities, due to, e.g., reentrant corners for d = 2, one either has to change the norms to incorporate a weight function as in [17, Proposition 2.3 and Remark 2.4] or use local mesh refinement as, e.g., in [15]. We refer to [17] for the definitions of the norms and omit such details here.…”
Section: Finite Element Approximation Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 6 presents the main contribution of this paper where the cost model, the construction and the complexity of the MDFEM algorithm are presented. Finally, a comparison with two existing methods, the QMCFEM [18] and MLQMCFEM [17], shows the benefit of the MDFEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations