1998
DOI: 10.2514/2.2336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel Simulation and Numerical Optimization of Complex Engineering Designs

Abstract: Multi-level representations have been studied extensively by arti cial intelligence researchers. We utilize the multi-level paradigm to attack the problem of performing multidiscipline engineering design optimization in the presence of many local optima. We use a m ultidisciplinary simulator at multiple levels of abstraction, paired with a multi-level search space. We tested the resulting system in the domain of conceptual design of supersonic transport aircraft, and found that using multilevel simulation and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the GBMS label was first coined by Chernukhin and Zingg, variations on this idea are present in the literature under a number of di↵erent names. [25][26][27][28][29] Chernukhin and Zingg developed specialized linear constraints which ensure the generated samples can be easily tailored to produce feasible geometries within the geometric bounds desired by the user. In our previous work 15 we expanded on this method, utilizing FFD geometry control to generalize these constraints to a geometry-independent form, producing an algorithm that can be applied to any geometry or class of problem.…”
Section: A Gradient-based Multistart Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the GBMS label was first coined by Chernukhin and Zingg, variations on this idea are present in the literature under a number of di↵erent names. [25][26][27][28][29] Chernukhin and Zingg developed specialized linear constraints which ensure the generated samples can be easily tailored to produce feasible geometries within the geometric bounds desired by the user. In our previous work 15 we expanded on this method, utilizing FFD geometry control to generalize these constraints to a geometry-independent form, producing an algorithm that can be applied to any geometry or class of problem.…”
Section: A Gradient-based Multistart Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the GBMS label is relatively new, equivalent methods have been used in the literature under other names. [12][13][14][15][16] In many of these works attention is paid to the idea of the feasible region in the design space. "Feasible" in this context goes beyond the more common definition used in most optimization applications, that is, a design for which all constraints have been satisfied.…”
Section: A Gradient Based Multistart Algorithm -Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On another hand, to deal with complex engineering design optimisation, different multi-level or multi-scale approaches, in which the whole problem is decomposed in several simpler sub-problems to be solved in a predetermined sequence, have been developed (see e.g. (Migdalas et al, 1997;Schwabacher et al, 1998)). Each optimisation sub-problem can differ according to objective function, constraints, design space and/or optimisation algorithm allowing a better treatment of complex systems (multidisciplinary design, multiple local optima, large-scale system, multi-objective optimisation...).…”
Section: Introduction To Multi-level Approaches In Aerodynamic Shape Designmentioning
confidence: 99%