Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Project Management 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316662243.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel Value Creation in Projects, Programs, and Portfolios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This segues well into Chapter 20 (Ang and Biesenthal, 2017) which takes a broad view of value from the perspective of the project, how that fits in with and aligns with programs and onto portfolios. Often the concept of value at the project level can distort actual value achieved at the organisational level.…”
Section: Part 3 -Peoplementioning
confidence: 87%
“…This segues well into Chapter 20 (Ang and Biesenthal, 2017) which takes a broad view of value from the perspective of the project, how that fits in with and aligns with programs and onto portfolios. Often the concept of value at the project level can distort actual value achieved at the organisational level.…”
Section: Part 3 -Peoplementioning
confidence: 87%
“…From these examples, the benefits (values) for different stakeholders can be said to be multi-leveled and multi-dimensional benefits and opportunities residing in the short-and long-term horizons and in the tangible and intangible realms of the project. Project value (and therefore potential opportunities) is inter-connected and could evolve during the course of project management as found by Ang and Biesenthal (2017). Typical project management approaches may fail to harness the diversities and complexities of project opportunity in these instances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This social approach also covers studies where actors are considered along with their personal characteristics, emotions, and anxieties. In this approach, the management of benefits is more likely socially constructed, along with stakeholders (Ang & Biesenthal, 2017). In spite of its potential to add nuances to benefits management, this social approach is still in development and remains marginal.…”
Section: Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%