Multilingualism in Post‐Soviet Successor States

Pavlenko, Aneta

doi:10.1111/lnc3.12024

Cited by 60 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At the present time when considering the problem of the status of the Russian language in the world, its role as a language of inter-ethnic communication and the disclosure of its essence in the countries of the post-Soviet space, there are different and sometimes opposing points of view (for instance, see (Dougherty, Kalyurand, 2015;Pavlenko, 2016;Zabrodskaya, Ekhala, 2015). On the one hand, the issue evokes the problem of excessive russification of the learning process, of discrimination and suppression of a national identity and the like.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forecasting Educational Relations Development Between Cis Countries (The Russian Language Factor)

Marinosyan¹,

Kurovskaya²

2017

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forecasting Educational Relations Development Between Cis Countries (The Russian Language Factor)

Marinosyan¹,

Kurovskaya²

2017

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The status of the Russian language is diminishing; the significance of English language is expanding in near terms with decades prior. From this point of view, a few researchers keep up Russian and English languages as a risk to the national virtue and danger to the advancement of main languages in Azerbaijan [11]. From creators perspective, the significance of Russian in Azerbaijan can abatement and exchange to the L2 talked status, if the quantity of Russian schools would increment.…”

Section: Multilingualism In Azerbaijanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multilingualism in Azerbaijan: The most Preferred Foreign Languages in Private Universities of the Country and Its Socioeconomic Aspects

Karimova¹

2017

IJECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The target reason for the present article analyzes the likelihood of foreign language in the education system of Azerbaijan: which examinations and deciding the most favored foreign language for this matter. Azerbaijan is a nation with customs of multilingualism. This examination was directed utilizing the graphic quantitative strategy including 301 understudies from two private Universities as a member. The instruments utilized for this examination study are the survey to distinguish whether the foreign language is bolstered among understudies in Azerbaijan, and which foreign language is favored most. Also, it was looked to inspect the relationship among factors of sex, social class, existing language abilities, and states of mind to the objective language inclination. It was found that language learning is bolstered by members, and English is the most favored foreign language. It demonstrates that multilingual societies like Azerbaijan are strong of language securing decisions that help protect and create multilingualism. In addition, it was found that mentality to foreign language learning itself vary because of salary level and existing language aptitudes.

show abstract

“…Transcarpathia is a special case that has remained largely unknown and essentially invisible for sociolinguistics. It is peculiar, for instance, that Pavlenko (2008Pavlenko ( , 2009Pavlenko ( , 2011Pavlenko ( , 2013 in her works often deals with different Ukrainian regions and cities, yet Transcarpathia is never mentioned. This may be regarded as evidence that Transcarpathia does not fit the general models of explanation of the Post-Soviet space, or Ukraine.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid practices meet nation-state language policies: Transcarpathia in the twentieth century and today

Csernicskó

Laihonen²

2016

Multilingua

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the early twentieth century to the present day, Transcarpathia has belonged to several states: the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy, Czechoslovakia, the Hungarian Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and finally to Ukraine. The status of what counts as a minority and a majority language has changed each time the state affiliation has been changed. Based on the long term research by Csernicskó, and on the one-month fieldwork carried out by Laihonen in 2012, our goal is to provide an autonomous critical account and discourse analysis of the linguistic situation in Transcarpathia. We draw examples especially from the linguistic landscape, which documents the hybrid practices difficult to catch with other means. Different nation states have aimed to evaluate certain languages over others. However, Transcarpathia has been too far away from different national centers and it has therefore remained a periphery. In the everyday life of Transcarpathians, ironies around language repertoires, standardization and heteroglossia come into the fore, especially in the current context. Such unexpected linguistic practices or "pre-nationalist" and "non-purist" ideologies offer a change to see how certain categories, such as language, have remained in their hybrid forms and are still clearly "in the making".

show abstract

Multilingualism in Post‐Soviet Successor States

Cited by 60 publications

References 38 publications

Forecasting Educational Relations Development Between Cis Countries (The Russian Language Factor)

Forecasting Educational Relations Development Between Cis Countries (The Russian Language Factor)

Multilingualism in Azerbaijan: The most Preferred Foreign Languages in Private Universities of the Country and Its Socioeconomic Aspects

Hybrid practices meet nation-state language policies: Transcarpathia in the twentieth century and today

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About