2021
DOI: 10.1111/weng.12557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilingualism, nation branding, and the ownership of English in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan

Abstract: This study examines the ownership of English and linguistic (in)security of multilingual English learners in two post‐Soviet nation‐states. Using the chronotopic and scalar analysis of discourse, I examine students’ ideologies of English vis‐à‐vis their linguistic repertoires in the context of national imaginary and globalization. I utilize the concept of ‘nation branding’ to trace the relationship between language ideologies and broader sociopolitical factors, including neoliberalism. The analysis of 60 indiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the branding potential of languages as an important resource for local strategies in nation branding, Brennan and Wilson (2016) investigate how in Shetland and Western Ireland, meanings associated with language are connected with how crises are framed and constructed in discourse. In a related study, Djuraeva (2022) utilises the concept of "nation branding" in two post-Soviet Union nation states -Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan -to trace the relationship between language ideologies and broader socio-political factors by examining students' ideologies of English vis-à-vis their linguistic repertoires in the context of national imaginary and globalisation. It is interesting how Lee and Kim (2021) explore South Korea's pandemic public diplomacy in the context of her national responses to COVID-19 pandemic, adopting sentiment analyses of social media and international news media which suggest that the country is perceived as a model on how to cope with the pandemic by international audiences.…”
Section: Overview Of Research Interests On Nation Branding Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the branding potential of languages as an important resource for local strategies in nation branding, Brennan and Wilson (2016) investigate how in Shetland and Western Ireland, meanings associated with language are connected with how crises are framed and constructed in discourse. In a related study, Djuraeva (2022) utilises the concept of "nation branding" in two post-Soviet Union nation states -Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan -to trace the relationship between language ideologies and broader socio-political factors by examining students' ideologies of English vis-à-vis their linguistic repertoires in the context of national imaginary and globalisation. It is interesting how Lee and Kim (2021) explore South Korea's pandemic public diplomacy in the context of her national responses to COVID-19 pandemic, adopting sentiment analyses of social media and international news media which suggest that the country is perceived as a model on how to cope with the pandemic by international audiences.…”
Section: Overview Of Research Interests On Nation Branding Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Ahn and Smagulova (2021) note, English in Kazakhstan remains inaccessible to the majority of the population while relatively small group was mostly accessible to a relatively small group of wealthy middle class having better access to English language resources. However, a high level of motivation to learn English as a prestigious language opens many economic (Djuraeva, 2021) and educational opportunities (Zhilbayev et al, 2019). The issue of trilingualism is especially acute in the western region of Kazakhstan, where the economic point of view is the largest oil and gas producing region country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%