IEEE Local Computer Network Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/lcn.2010.5735733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimedia QoE optimized management using prediction and statistical learning

Abstract: Abstract-We present a scheme for flow management with heterogeneous access technologies available indoors and in a campus network such as GPRS, 3G and Wi-Fi. Statistical learning is used as a key for optimizing a target variable namely video quality of experience (QoE). First we analyze the data using passive measurements to determine relationships between parameters and their impact on the main performance indicator, video Quality of Experience (QoE). The derived weights are used for performing prediction in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mok et al [23] -The rebuffering frequency is the important factor responsible for the QoE variance -Temporal structure, instead of spatial artifacts, is an important factor affecting the QoE. Elkotob et al [32] -The proposed scheme allows a mobile node to be proactively aware of the best access network for the next interval. -This scheme would be interesting for operators and service providers who need to maintain graceful QoE profiles and optimize their resource usage.…”
Section: Malinovskimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mok et al [23] -The rebuffering frequency is the important factor responsible for the QoE variance -Temporal structure, instead of spatial artifacts, is an important factor affecting the QoE. Elkotob et al [32] -The proposed scheme allows a mobile node to be proactively aware of the best access network for the next interval. -This scheme would be interesting for operators and service providers who need to maintain graceful QoE profiles and optimize their resource usage.…”
Section: Malinovskimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al [33] × × × × Machado et al [37] × × × × Du et al [39] × × Kim et al [21] × × × Khan et al [42] × × Malinovski et al [44] × × × × Han et al [50] × × × × × × Laghari et al [51] × × × Ramos et al [28] × × × Koumaras et al [22] × × × Frank et al [40] × × × Calyam et al [41] × × × × × × Mok et al [23] × × Elkotob et al [32] × × × × × × Mushtaq et al [38] × × × × Hoßfeld et al [45] × × × ×…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, depending on the QoE values type, offline batch models can be divided into two groups. The first group uses the regression analysis to approximate the QoE as a continuous function of QoS parameters like in [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].The second group uses classification methods to predict the QoE class [25][26][27][28][29]. In the following sections, we briefly describe these models.…”
Section: Qoe-qos Correlation Models Using MLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For QoE modeling, the Me used; this metric is explaine example models for video are p QoE is taken as the linear w he last mile or access network n in Figure 1 is Table 1 and some QoE provided in [22]. For this model weighted sum of TTFB, delay bound, and packet loss rate (PLR) with all coefficients being equal and the result normalized to fit the MOS scale of 1-5.…”
Section: Figure 4: Proposed Cdn Architecmentioning
confidence: 99%