2009
DOI: 10.4236/iim.2009.13024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Belief Fusion for Face and Ear Biometrics

Abstract: This paper proposes a multimodal biometric system through Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) for face and ear biometrics with belief fusion of the estimated scores characterized by Gabor responses and the proposed fusion is accomplished by Dempster-Shafer (DS) decision theory. Face and ear images are convolved with Gabor wavelet filters to extracts spatially enhanced Gabor facial features and Gabor ear features. Further, GMM is applied to the high-dimensional Gabor face and Gabor ear responses separately for quantit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e modified-Vote rule is reported slightly inferior to score-level fusion schemes such as Sum and Product rules, while it is comparable to the Median-rule. Kisku et al [38] apply two trained Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) to estimate the match score distributions of Gabor features of the face and ear, respectively, and, then, verify an identity based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. ey get an EER of 4.47% on the IIT Kanpur multimodal database, having 400 subjects in total.…”
Section: Decision-level Fusion Methods Rahman and Ishikawamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e modified-Vote rule is reported slightly inferior to score-level fusion schemes such as Sum and Product rules, while it is comparable to the Median-rule. Kisku et al [38] apply two trained Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) to estimate the match score distributions of Gabor features of the face and ear, respectively, and, then, verify an identity based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. ey get an EER of 4.47% on the IIT Kanpur multimodal database, having 400 subjects in total.…”
Section: Decision-level Fusion Methods Rahman and Ishikawamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other types of facial expressions, they achieved 98.1% and 96.83% identification and verification rates, respectively. Kisku et al [2009b] used Gabor filters to extract features of landmarked images of face and ear. They used a locally collected database of 1600 images from 400 subjects.…”
Section: Frontal Face and Earmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with multimodal biometric recognition, feature fusion has become a very important research aspect [4]- [12], because fusing different types of features provides complementary information. Most of the recent human recognition works [10], [13-[17] utilized feature level fusion to overcome the challenges of constrained resources, and to increase the system security and system performance. The well-known traditional feature fusion methods involve serial and parallel fusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, recognition metrics have been considered as an important research point for the development of multimodal biometric recognition systems. To the best of our knowledge, most of the previous works [4], [9], [10], [13], [15], [16] have adopted traditional distance metrics and classifiers. Due to the number of images per person that are usually limited to 3∼5 images and with noises, traditional distance metrics and classifiers cannot achieve the performance desired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%