Multimodal exploration of civic stance in the English Language Arts classroom

Abstract

Purpose This study/paper aims to explore civic participation within multimodal expression. With the rise of content produced and circulated within participatory cultures online, there has been much attention raised regarding questions of audience and attention to this content. For example, does production of media content constitute having a voice if no one is paying attention? Design/methodology/approach Using multimodal analysis and mediated discourse analysis, this study examines adolescents’ school-based media production and use of multimodal ensembles to recruit and maintain audience attention to specific content in their radio and video documentaries. Findings Research findings reveal deliberate attempts to connect with audience needs when creating media as well as exploration of emerging civic identities. Research limitations/implications Questions for how researchers in literacy and learning can further investigate and articulate civic engagement and advocacy are suggested. Practical implications Implications for how teachers can use multimodality to create spaces for civic engagement are provided. Originality/value This study is original in that few studies have applied the concepts of participatory politics to media products and process conducted in school settings. This study begins to test the utility of these constructs.

Hearing Knowledge into Action: Mobilizing Sound for Multicultural Imaginaries

“…This sound ensemble occurs one minute and 30 seconds into the 7-minute podcast. Although this same sound ensemble has been discussed in other articles for its strategic use of sound to recruit and maintain audiences (Doerr-Stevens, 2017), it is used here to illustrate the social and interpretive struggles that can occur in collaboratively composed media in school contexts. In an attempt to make visual the workings of sound, Figure 1 illustrates a track analysis of the ensemble showing the distinct sound elements.…”

Making space for choice, voice and critique: critical literacy workshop in the era of Trump

“…The practice of engaging with political issues within literacy instruction well predates Trump, as evidenced by the significant body of literature on critical literacy (Behrman, 2006; Freebody and Freiberg, 2011). Recent research on critical literacy instruction has focused on both how teachers and students engage with political issues in their classrooms (Brown and Mowry, 2017; Hermann-Wilmarth et al , 2017; So, 2016) and how teachers can support students in developing the tools necessary to engage in political discourse and action (Doerr-Stevens, 2017; Ghiso, 2015; Huh and Suh, 2017). Yet, the existing literature on critical literacy practice also illustrates challenges.…”

Designing more just social futures or remixing the radical present?

“…Scholarship at the intersection of digital media production and youth multimodal composition typically reads the practices and products of composing, like Gabe’s digital archive and wall, as unfolding of young peoples’ identities (Doerr-Stevens, 2017; Johnson, 2011; Lewis Ellison, 2014; Moje and Luke, 2009; Nelson et al , 2008; Vasudevan, 2010). Refracted through a multi- and situated-literacies lens (Barton and Hamilton, 2000; New London Group, 1996, Street, 1995), research continues to ask how, if at all, are young people designing more just social futures?…”