ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2006
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2006.314392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Human-Robot Interaction Framework for a Personal Robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a few approaches in robotics incorporate both speech and gesture synthesis; however, in most cases the robots are equipped with a set of pre-recorded gestures that are not generated on-line but simply replayed during humanrobot interaction, as seen in [8] or [40]. Moreover, a majority of approaches focusing on gesture synthesis for humanoid robots are limited to the implementation and evaluation of a single type of gesture, typically deictic (e.g., [32,41]) or emblematic gestures (e.g., [13]) instead of providing a general framework that can handle all types of gesture.…”
Section: Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few approaches in robotics incorporate both speech and gesture synthesis; however, in most cases the robots are equipped with a set of pre-recorded gestures that are not generated on-line but simply replayed during humanrobot interaction, as seen in [8] or [40]. Moreover, a majority of approaches focusing on gesture synthesis for humanoid robots are limited to the implementation and evaluation of a single type of gesture, typically deictic (e.g., [32,41]) or emblematic gestures (e.g., [13]) instead of providing a general framework that can handle all types of gesture.…”
Section: Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, there are some other sociable robots, which were designed to establish relationships with humans, for example, Autom (Kidd and Breazeal, 2008), which was designed to play a role as a weight loss coach to guide humans to loss their weight, which showed that developing long-term close relationship between human and robot was practicable, ATR's Robovie (Kahn et al 2008), which had a social characteristic that could provide physical intimacy (e.g., holding, touching, embracing) with human, and MAGGIE (Gorostiza et al 2006), whose main goal is to interact in a natural way and establish a peer-to-peer relationship with humans. Moreover, there was a research platform for studying social robotic user-interfaces, called iCat (-interactive cat‖), developed by Philips, which was equipped with the capabilities of vision, conversation and facial expression and used to examine the influence of the perceived social abilities of a robot on user's attitude towards and acceptance of the robot (Heerink et al 2006).…”
Section: Robot Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of all these robot's skills is in constant growing. More details about Maggie's features and some of her capabilities can be found in [19], [21].…”
Section: Maggie: the Social Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%