2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Interaction: Intuitive, Robust, and Preferred?

Abstract: Abstract. We investigated if and under which conditions multimodal interfaces (touch, speech, motion control) fulfil the expectation of being superior to unimodal interfaces. The results show that the possibility of multimodal interaction with a handheld mobile device turned out to be more intuitive, more robust, and more preferred than the interaction with the individual modalities speech and motion control. However, it was not clearly superior to touch.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AER systems can rely on a wide range of modalities, including speech, text, gestures/posture, and physiological responses (e.g., via changes in heart/breathing rates). For so-called "in the wild" applications, multimodal systems are preferred in order to compensate for certain confounds and to improve overall AER accuracy by providing the system with some redundancy and complementary information not available with unimodal systems (Naumann et al, 2009;Parent et al, 2019). Multimodal systems, however, can be very time consuming to implement, costly to run, and potentially intrusive to the users (e.g., requiring on-body sensors with physiological data collection) and their privacy (Sebe et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AER systems can rely on a wide range of modalities, including speech, text, gestures/posture, and physiological responses (e.g., via changes in heart/breathing rates). For so-called "in the wild" applications, multimodal systems are preferred in order to compensate for certain confounds and to improve overall AER accuracy by providing the system with some redundancy and complementary information not available with unimodal systems (Naumann et al, 2009;Parent et al, 2019). Multimodal systems, however, can be very time consuming to implement, costly to run, and potentially intrusive to the users (e.g., requiring on-body sensors with physiological data collection) and their privacy (Sebe et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%