We thank Dr. Ran et al for their valuable comments on our study. 1 First, we agree that a more convenient functional test for glaucoma is still needed, and algorithms based on single modality examinations such as fundus photography and OCT should be more feasible in large-scale glaucoma screening in the general population. However, visual field tests are essential and currently irreplaceable in glaucoma clinics, although they may take additional time. Visual field tests are helpful to differentiate glaucoma from high myopia and neuro-ophthalmic diseases. The best solution to the problem of visual field testing taking too much time is to design a simplified perimetry test, say using goggles to perform perimetry test, rather than giving up the test entirely. In many high-impact artificial intelligence studies, 2e4 OCT plus visual field data are used as the ground truth, demonstrating the importance and essence of visual field data in a glaucoma diagnosis.Second, diagnostic algorithms like FusionNet could, to a certain extent, bridge the imbalance of medical resources among regions in China. The difficulties and clinical needs of glaucoma diagnosis vary by region. There is a lack of glaucoma specialists in developed areas and we need a more precise clinical evaluation of glaucoma. Our algorithm could assist ophthalmologists who are not glaucoma subspecialists in diagnosing glaucoma based on visual field and OCT data, just as we do in clinical practice. In developing areas, there are fewer ophthalmologists and glaucoma screening is more important. OCT machines are rapidly spreading in these areas. OCTNet, the OCT processing module of FusionNet, could be used to diagnose glaucoma based on OCT images.Third, as the components of FusionNet, the VFNet and OCTNet can extract features of Pattern deviation probability plots from visual field data and peripapillary circular scans from OCT when only one kind of data is available, as we mentioned in the article. 1